Official Washington will be quiet this week, but the fallout from the Kyle Rittenhouse verdict will continue to divide America along the Trumpian fault lines of fear, violence, and racism.
Closing arguments are scheduled today in the trial of three men charged with the killing of Ahmaud Arbery in Georgia. Though they chased him, they are claiming self-defense because, they say, Arbery tried to get control of a shotgun one of them was carrying. As with the Rittenhouse case, the trial raises questions of how self-defense laws will hold up as guns proliferate. Regardless of how it come out, the case also illustrates America’s deepening split.
Congress’s continuing investigation into the January 6 insurrection reveals the same rift, as will the Supreme Court’s expected decision on executive privilege in that investigation, and its likely move to strike down New York State’s law requiring people seeking licenses to carry handguns in public to show a “proper cause,” as violating the Second Amendment.
The fault line has now extended into almost every facet of American lawmaking. When the “Build Back Better” bill passed the House late Friday night, 220 out of 221 Democrats voted for it. But all of the House’s 213 Republicans voted against it. Why? The measures in the bill are hugely popular, according to polls. The bill includes the largest expansion of federal child-care assistance in history; free, universal prekindergarten for all American children ages 3 and 4; Medicare benefits covering hearing services; government for the first time being allowed to negotiate some prescription drug prices, aiming to lower the costs that seniors pay for lifesaving medicines such as insulin; and more than $550 billion to combat climate change — promoting greener energy and providing new perks for Americans who buy electric vehicles.
But policy popularity may be no match for fear, violence, and racism — which Republicans and the moneyed interests are now diligently exploiting to kill the bill in the Senate. So-called “moderate” Democrats (Senators Joe Manchin and Kyrsten Sinema) have expressed skepticism about its cost and scope. It would be one thing if Manchin’s and Sinema’s reservations were in good faith, but how can they be? Manchin frets about the bill’s effects on inflation even though the bill lowers prices for most Americans of major expenses like childcare, drugs, and healthcare. Sinema says she prefers “legislation that is crafted in a bipartisan way,” but who is she kidding? Mitch McConnell has made clear he won’t allow a single Republican senator to vote for the bill.
The votes of every Senate Democrat are needed if the bill is to pass, but Manchin and Sinema are allowing rightwing tropes — and the big money behind them — to divide Democrats. As the New York Times reported yesterday, cash has poured into Manchin’s and Sinema’s political coffers from political action committees and donors linked to Wall Street, Big Pharma, and Big Energy, which have opposed proposals in the bill that Manchin and Sinema helped scale back.
The question that keeps haunting me is this: Is an America so deeply divided, and awash in political money that exploits that divide, any longer capable of doing bold things that are broadly popular? The only big thing we continue to do is feed the ravenous military-industrial complex — itself founded on fear, violence, and racism. (Efforts to whip up a new cold war with China conjure up old fears of a “yellow peril.”) Congress is on the verge of giving the Pentagon even more money than the Pentagon and the Biden administration are seeking. The nation’s military tab over the next ten years will be upwards of $8 trillion and is not paid for with expected revenue, in sharp contrast with the $2 trillion cost of the House’s “Build Back America” plan, which would be paid for with tax increases on the wealthy and big corporations.
That America is becoming two separate nations is threatening everything we value. The most obvious beneficiaries (besides top executives of big corporations and Wall Street) are Donald Trump, Vladimir Putin, and Rupert Murdoch, who appear to be doing whatever they can to divide us even further.
Your thoughts?
Throughout our history, the wealthy elites have incited racial animus to maintain their power. This is nothing new in our country. I think Trump's election was in part a backlash to the fact that a Black man was elected and reelected president. According to Washington Post columnist Michael Gerson, Trump's star rose in the Republican Party when he began vociferously promoting so-called birtherism, the notion that President Obama was not born in this country, and was therefore illegitimate. The wealthy Republican elites also don't like Black people demanding equal treatment. As police are starting to be held to account for gratuitous violence against Black people, White Supremacist thugs with guns are becoming a convenient tool to keep Black people in their place.
President Biden and other Democratic Party leaders could find a compelling way to call out wealthy elitist Republicans on their persistent playing the race card to maintain power and accumulate more and more wealth. Instead, the Democratic Party establishment has decided to make progressives the bogeymen. The New York Times published an interview yesterday with Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. She said that she and other progressives were explicitly commanded by party leaders to stay away from the 2021 Virginia elections. They were then blamed for the losses.
I agree with you Carolyn, but I also believe that merely pointing out how Republicans have stoked the fires of racial resentment would be insufficient. Over the past several decades, Democrats have left working class voters of all races behind by failing to pass policies that deal with core economic concerns (wages, childcare, etc.).
The Build Back Better agenda--even in its shrunken form--represents a meaningful investment in America's working class, so we can hope that when the legislation passes, it somewhat moves the political needle.
Yes, passing Build Back Better is crucial. As AOC pointed out in the interview that I referenced, if Democrats don't keep the promises they made, there is no reason to vote for them. But the political side is critically important as well. If Republicans gain control of both houses of Congress and the presidency, they will immediately try to repeal BBB, as they did with Obamacare.
Listen to Bob Dylan's song 'Only A Pawn in the Game' that describes the exploitation of fear and hatred in working class whites to use them against Blacks, and people of color.
Yep -- the times ain't a-changing.
Why can't Biden do what the President of New Zealand did a few years ago after a shooting incident? She banned the ownership of assault weapons by the public. I guess their country has a different legal system. We are tied in knots here, it seems.
If you think it through, you'll probably realize why Biden can not.
Wishful thinking, I know. 2nd amendment and most likely plenty I do not know about all the rules governing the President's powers. probably a good thing too.
Congress passed, in 1934, a law that placed a heavy tax on the purchase of submachine guns (Tommy Guns), which required buyers of these lethal weapons to be fingerprinted. After passage of the law, anyone caught with an unregistered Tommy Gun could be prosecuted for tax evasion like Al Capone. In 1934, the USA was being terrorized by Bonnie & Clyde, Machine Gun Kelly, Alvin Karpis and others. Today, we are being terrorized by rogue shooters. But in contrast with 1934, there's no will in Congress to ban AR-15s and other assault weapons.
Very slowly the consciousness grows. But it does grow.
And then it seems to wane, unfortunately. Just when you think you have gotten through to people, they disappoint you. Aaugh!
I agree with this - President Biden and other Democratic Party leaders could find a compelling way to call out wealthy elitist Republicans on their persistent playing the race card to maintain power and accumulate more and more wealth. Instead, the Democratic Party establishment has decided to make progressives the bogeymen. This is why people like me start wondering if there are legitimately two parties here or just one. Would love to discuss why people think this is happening.
Perhaps we will split off into multiple parties more like England. Three never works because the big two can kill it. But they can’t necessarily kill off several, if enough people abandon (and I think we’re ripe for this). We have some big wins by the Dems. With so much more to go. But why aren’t we seeing the punishment of murderers and traitors who attempted a coup on our country? Murderers wait for trial while in prison all the time. Has Putin threatened us and we don’t know it? Have a few countries threatened us? Are we unable to depend on enough police and military to back the constitution from domestic enemies?
Non-answers and snail-paced actions are very much hurting the Democrats. Leaving us to imagine what is happening is not a good idea.
I think we’ll be forced into civil disobedience and boycotts on the scale of pre-civil rights.
Boycotts. civil disobedience, Taxation without representation. Maybe it's time for our own 'tea party'. Or pushback of some kind. The insurrectionists/terrorists should be dealt with effectively. Are the judiciary and the military also tainted by traitors? What is our commander in chief doing? who are his advisors? The former guy let all the criminals off with pardons in a way that I never would have believed could be allowed. They are all at it still People like Flynn, whose brother was involved with the insurrection. WTF is going on?!?
So true Laurie. I have said many times…how can that be legal, constitutional etc! It’s like we have found out we just another mafia nit a country at all. Nightmare!
If McConnell won't allow any republican to vote with Dems, why are they even there?
Very good question. If they are not being democratic why are their salaries being paid? why are they drawing pay and benefits from us, the taxpayers? We are definitely not getting what they are supposed to do for us! Our government is not working! Oaths of office are a silly meaningless ceremony! Corruption rules! Our 'representatives' are bribed to work for someone else. The powerful are getting what they want and are fine with this arrangement! Something has got to give! Nothing here is sustainable!
I feel the frustration positively dripping off you, Laurie. You’re expressing what I think we’re all feeling: how can this be and why doesn’t someone do something about it already? I wish I had some answers.
refuse to pay taxes!
Laurie, you said it exactly correctly. But, you've heard it here from me: Just watch when Trump wins in 2024. How? Why? Because everybody in power on all sides is allowing it to happen. The courts cannot withstand the constant fights of those that are ruining our vote by putting in stipulations that the GOP governors can put in place their own election certifiers if they don't like how a vote will turn out. The GOP no longer cares if the Public sees their dishonesty and manipulation of the law, they are plowing forward with the backing of Bezos, Mercer, and the like. As well, with the backing of right-wing owned media. I see it all coming.
Yikes!
So much for representing your constituents.
Paula, sadly, that is getting rarer and rarer.
Because they are blind followers and do their masters bidding.
And they have their eyes open and take their master's money. Hey, what about a class action lawsuit!? We, the people sue the Supreme Court for allowing this travesty?
I like the idea. But, at best it would be very difficult due to judicial immunity. It appears the case would have to be filed as judicial misconduct. What legal team would file the case and what court would hear the case is questionable.
Democratic Supreme Court justices have done themselves and the country a disservice throughout the years by remaining in office until death. This has given the Republicans the opportunity of filling the position vacated by a Democrat with a Republican justice. Republican Supreme Court justices on the other hand have retired when a Republican president was in office affording the Republican president the opportunity to elect a Republican replacement. This, and Mitch McConnells gamesmanship, has stacked the Supreme Court in the Republicans favor.
When one side plays by the rules and the other side continually bends the rules there can be no fair outcome.
So, now what? Where do we go from here?
I think (I’m hoping!) the outcome of the 1/6 select committee will bring some resolution to the larger issues we’re facing today. Which, ultimately, may force the Republican Party to separate from Trump and act more responsibly. But, as long as Trump continues to bring big money to the Party, the Party will continue to follow Trump. Ending that cash flow will separate Trump from the Party. I believe holding Trump legally responsible for the 1/6 riot (insurrection) will accomplish this. This appears to be the 1/6 committee’s goal. They just need to get through the frivolous Trump lawsuits and come to a determination before the ‘22 midterms. 🤞
They were not elected to work with the Dems. They represent those constituents who weren't dissuaded to vote. And, those voters want them to block the Dems and regain GOP power ASAP, by any means necessary
Not entirely. My so-called rep in CA-25 won by 333 votes—not exactly a mandate. There are many in this district who do not want him to behave as he does. I sincerely hope the bum is thrown out next time.
Paula: My comment was about Lucy's comment about McConnell & (implicitly, I felt) GOP Senators. Of course, their elections are statewide, often the SUM of <dissuaded voters in gerrymandered districts>, with little control over their House Rep.
The GOP Senate bloc is united to oppose Biden accomplishing ANYthing that might help the jack-arse party in the midterms. Opposing the debt limit, destroying the economy short-term, thwarting fair elections, and anything else is fine for them, because it gives them a greater chance to regain power for their base in 2022
Understood. 😀
Makes sense that they want what they legally paid for!
True, it seems, at this point. But what about the Constitution and the rule of law? Only a 'gentlemen's agreement'? What happened to 'statesmanship' and 'honor'? Treachery is now legal, I guess.
Responsible citizens must be courageous & nonviolent to best combat the fear, violence, & racism of the GOP. Courage is grace under pressure. So we must gracefully pass the BBB Act, & then end the filibuster. This will be difficult, due to the millions GOP donors are giving to Manchin & Sinema. But this legislation is essential to win the 2022 elections. I do not even want to think of a United States with Kevin McCarthy as Speaker.
For many, Thanksgiving dinner will provide an opportunity for responsible citizens to be courageous with our families and friends.
As long as we don't get them so mad they won't feed us!
Yes, with families, friends, and narcissists.
I don’t imagine anyone doesn’t want to see Dems get more aggressive. In this regard, I see an opening for Dems to take on BBB detractors. Dems should be prevailed upon to demand that its detractors explain not what they oppose, but what they are in favor of for their communities. For instance, are they for extending the child tax credit, for universal child care, for universal pre-K, for investments in housing, in elder care, in home and community-based care, in ACA subsidies, in climate, and so forth.
I fear if Dems don’t get more aggressive on a host of issues, that last Monday’s BIF signing ceremony could be the last opportunity of any President to stand in front of a bipartisan audience and say this is how Washington should work.
Sadly corporate Dems are sabotaging their own messaging around BBB with tax cuts for their wealthy donors by repealing the SALT limits. Giving tax cuts to the wealthy while campaigning on having the wealthy pay their fair share exposes their own corruption and hypocrisy.
Peter— Were I to rewrite, I would have called on the 48 Democratic Senators whom I believe largely support the House’s version of the BBB bill aggressively to challenge the two Democratic Senate holdouts by demanding they explain not what they oppose but what they are in favor of for their communities. Additionally, I would have pressed Senate Democrats to be far more aggressive in challenging the few in their Party, who refuse, without support from Republicans, to pass voter protection legislation, while GOP controlled state legislatures unilaterally continue to pass bill after bill that restricts voting and nullifies votes at will.
They most likely had to bribe them. Payola is how it works, isn't it?
I share your comments!
a
If a person of your stature fears.... I am NOW TRULY WORRIED!
I am usually a positive person but we have reached a tipping point.
This just may be historically the "downside of capitalism" .., very sad.
The rich get richer ,.. more powerful, more corrupt.
History is full of nations that rise and fall.
"The grandeur that was Rome!"
Plenty of hubris on the upper deck, that's for sure!
With things like the electoral college, gerrymandering, the filibuster, politicians for sale and a supreme court stacked with Trump stooges, the odds against America as we know it are strongly unfavorable.
The Democrats must win an overwhelming majority just to implement popular policies that the rich and powerful oppose.
The similarities to the rise of authoritarian fascism in Germany in 1932 are too strong to overlook.
Giving more money to Act Blue and Democratic candidates who accept corporate money and huge PAC money from unidentified donors is just a waste of money better spent locally.
Bernie, Mayor Pete. AOC and other progressive politicians will never be allowed to rise to meaningful positions of power. Should a fluke happen, it is likely they will be assassinated as was JFK, RFK, MLK and other politicians who have paid with their lives for their beliefs in a more perfect union.
The only viable solution is to start planning to leave the failing Disunited States. Take the money you are wasting on political contributions and start saving so you can escape the sinking ship.
Sorry to be so blunt and pessimistic but changing America is simply not possible.
Maybe if the country was slit up, there might be some hope, but that will never happen.
Kurt Vonnegut envisioned an eventual breakup of the USA. It happened in 1861, and there's no reason it can't happen again. One solution is for Democrats and lefties to migrate into blue states; ditto for red Republicans, who can migrate to red states. And then a constitutional convention leading to the breakup. One definition of a nation is a country that is comprised of people who see life in basically the same way. Migration could be a first step in achieving non-neurotic nationhood.
Do you really think the Anti-Abortion half wouldn't use its nukes on the Pro-Choice half?
Yeah but they could be reminded that nukes affect a very large area where they are deployed. Also, there may be those who are expecting. Would they want to kill the unborn? I don't see them marching against war though, during recent conflicts. I guess it's when they want to control the local source of 'human resources'.
i don't think this is a horrible idea except a few issues: (1) peace is easier to achieve when we are one country (2) China benefits -- not sure that's a terrible thing but not sure what their future agenda is and they don't have a great human rights / animal rights history (3) too many people will lose things (money, land, jobs) etc. so not sure it can happen.
Us vs. them, or away from them, is exactly what Trump is about. We have to look deeper.
I look deep into the soul of McConnell and find bad faith. Ditto for too many denizens of the Reptilian party. To use a sports analogy, when only one team plays by the rules and in the spirit of good sportsmanship, that admirable team loses. But I do agree with you insofar as acting ethically goes; it's the results that bother me.
I agree. I did not mean looking deep in the lost souls of the Republican party but looking deep in ourselves to find the resources we need to build back better. To my mind, this is inherently inclusive. On the other hand, it does not mean at all that we should assume Mitch McConnell is potentially ready to collaborate for the common good in a bi-partisan way. This is just the lame excuse given by corporate democrats to keep getting bribes.
If I may: Have faith. There are way more well-meaning people than crazed bigots. Our inability to see right now how things can change is rooted in two facts, one being that politicians are bought with the Supreme Court's blessing, the other that the media's business model runs against speaking truth to power. All of us are needed to provide the alternative to both.
In the United States at present the majority is ruled by the minority. State borders are totally artificial constructs. We can even add States. To give a state, an artificial hunk of land, so much power is anti-democratic.
Why should a citizen of Montana have 100 or thousand or 1 million times more say in the operation and laws of the United States than say a citizen of Texas, California or New York?
Until we fix or eliminate the Senate so that it is one person, one vote we will never be able to accomplish the things that we desire.
The Democrats could play better poker and go all in and eliminate the filibuster, then pass the kinds of laws that themajority want enacted
The Founding Fathers were fearful of the people, whom they saw as irremediably ignorant and unruly. They consequently set the template of a republic, not a democracy, and made sure that one man one vote could not exist. A few more amendments to the Constitution might be in order.
I am sick of the myth of the Founding Fathers.
They were all white males. Many were slave owners.
Only property owners could vote, so the uneducated and unsuccessful had no vote. Certainly slaves were merely property and in the census counted as 3/5 of a person.
Women had no rights to vote at all no mater how much property they owned.
Money was the determining factor in who had political power. Still is.
The Founding Fathers never envisioned political parties or allowing the uneducated the right to vote.
The idea of a Senate may have worked with only 13 states and most people stayed put in the same state from birth to death.
The provisions on how to chage the constitution are so odious as to be an impossibility.
We cannot even ratify the Equal Rights Amendment.
When something is as broken as is America, can it ever really be “fixed”?
I only wish that all Americans went beyond the Founding Fathers myth as you do. At the same time, we have to recognize they have the huge merit of having crafted a functional form of government that is secular. To your point, they also made sure to elaborate an electoral system guaranteeing that the country could never become a definite democracy. Our arcane electoral rules have long become obsolete and it is a wonder to the rest of the world why they are still in place. Most importantly, the Founding Fathers locked up the Constitution, making it next to impossible to amend, at least in my understanding (I am a recent American citizen). The problem is that the way they saw humanity is a bit dated. I am sure Robert Reich has many suggestions about what could be done and how in order to change the Constitution toward a democratic form of government.
Back then, most working people did not have the ability to read and write. It was important that those who were not educated not be able to vote for a charlatan or demagogue. That is how it was explained to me in civics class a long time ago. nobody saw Fox news and other misinformation sources coming. But the electoral college and the senate give the wealthy an advantage, too.
The American "revolution" consisted in departing from monarchy to establish a republic. A genuine revolution would have consisted in guaranteeing access to education to all people. Assuming, on the contrary, that poor illiterate people will always remain this way and thus cannot participate in politics is not precisely forward-thinking. By the same token, the French revolution did not take place on Bastille Day; it was achieved one hundred later with the institution of free (money-wise) and mandatory education for all children, as well as with the definite separation of church and state. No kidding. A revolution does not consist in declaring all people free and then doing as if some people are through their right of birth freer than others; it consists in effectively guaranteeing a fighting chance to all. Interestingly and back to the topic of who benefits from a nation coming apart over fear, violence, and racism, Republicans have nothing more urgent than de-financing public education and bringing Allah into government.
But still the nagging question. Where to go? Climate destruction is everywhere. In the 60's the song was "the air, the air is everywhere!". it's worse now.
Get money out of politics. That will clear up the path forward. Republicans and corporate-bribed Democrats do not favor genuine debates. Have you noticed?
I have mentioned money in politics many times in this forum, and I agree it is not a good thing.
What's on trial right now in the back-to-back Arbery and Rittenhouse cases is not only the "self-defense" defense, but also vigilantism. The three men accused of Arbery's murder could easily have called police to investigate what they thought was suspicious activity. Instead, something (take a guess) motivated them to make a "citizens arrest." In that case, it was Arbery, not the murderer, who acted in self defense. Rittenhouse apparently wanted to prove his manhood by strutting around in a volatile protest and brandishing an assault rifle as a self-appointed security guard in Kenosha. There was no way that was going to end well. How many other racists, extremists, conspiracy theorists, pretend soldiers, and militia members will take it upon themselves to threaten people, provoke them, kill them, and claim they acted in self-defense? We might want to add flak jackets to our Christmas lists.
There are a lot of gun owners who can't wait to use them on people they perceive as "others".
One of the Kardashian sisters sells cosmetics on the Internet. She has millions of followers. Greta Thumberg has hundreds of thousands. Humanity very much prefers to be distracted from reality. We are like the water spider, so light it can walk on the surface of the water. However, to reproduce, it has to pierce the water membrane an swim down to the bottom of the river to lay her eggs. So we will continue walking on the water as long as we can, living in distractions and illusions. The propaganda machine loves this human predisposition. We are in a bad way.
you are spot on. this thread and a few others like it might be our only hope.
At least good sharing and support. Maybe some good ideas. some things to learn.
Also Margaret Mead's quote “Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world: indeed, it's the only thing that ever has.” Not sure we can wait around for the folks who only want to buy cosmetics and we may need to move forward and save our world without them.
This may sound provocative to many but I do not think that the country is divided, at least not in the sense usually referred to. The Trump faultline does exist only because most people who form the Republican base are utterly misinformed. When polled about what is in the BBB without mentioning the bill itself, they overwhelming favor its proposed reforms. Most people know what they need. So, no, the country is not divided that much. What divides us is that some (or many) fall prey to the divide and conquer technique used throughout history by those who stoke fear and anger to profit from gullible masses.
As of today, this division in the U.S. will remain as long as "moderate" democrat reps will not be called out for being, in reality, bribed democrats (legally but bribed nevertheless) with a huge conflict of interest when it comes to representing the people. Trump or Murdoch are just fanning the flames of division. They could not be able to do it with such a facility if those who are supposed to be the good guys did their job and had the moral courage to stand for the truth. When someone fights for the American people instead of for the interests of corporate donors, people in Trump's country tend to trust him or her. Ask Bernie Sanders.
Our division is just superficial. Ignorance and stupidity can turn deadly but their primary enablers are those who refuse to get money out of politics.
As long as it is a win for them they will continue to be unethical and greedy. Calling them out is a good strategy! Everyone wants to be liked. It's hard to win if people will not vote for you, because they have your number!
There are many entities that benefit. Corporations, power hungry politicians and adversaries throughout the world, to name a few. Racists fear they're being replaced, religious zealots fear they're losing control of their flock and political influence and we can't forget hate groups that feel empowered by the fear they help create. We also must include people who perform racist, hate and discrimination against fellow Americans. Where will this end up, especially with a judicial system that is failing us, will depend on how the American people stand up and fight to change the atrocities happening here every day. We must act now.
There are divisions but they are exaggerated. I am an independent and the news media portray nothing about my interests. Everything is Dem vs Rep and only the extremes are reported. No poll shows where those of us who are not affiliated with a political party fit in the conversation. And we represent about 1/3 of the country. Division is also being exaggerated by the gerrymandering and voter suppression laws being passed. Those actions create an unjust distribution of votes and voter preferences. And also Democrats have contributed a lot to the division by being radical about policy. There is very little common ground in the party and that contributes to endless debates about how to move forward, how to progress. The one issue that all Dems should get behind, and Indies as well, is the influence of "big money" in our political system. Attack that, and a lot of the power to control the political agenda becomes minimized. Campaign contributions, lobbying and the connection to contributions, limitless terms, gains from insider info, all contribute to the Repugnants control and should be the first priority and anyone who sees themselves as a protector of our Democracy.
i agree that this should be a top issue, and I agree that everything is Dem vs. Rep instead of the actual issues and some solutions. This is yet another reason I sometimes get the impression that maybe we just have one party in this country. It's this kind of ineffectiveness that makes me wonder. That said, I continue to assume there are really two parties maybe because that makes me feel better. I agree this should be the number one issue and that the rest of the issues might take care of themselves if we resolve this issue. That said, I don't think we need to limit ourselves to this one issue. It should be our top issue, but not the only issue. We should be able to accomplish more than this.
I agree that we should be able to address multiple issues, but i believe as I think you do, that eliminating big money in politics would pave the way for a lot of progress.
I have thought that because of money in politics Democrat and Republican are really two sides of the coin of the realm. I have heard some say that they both take money from donors who give to both parties. The donors want their influence no matter who wins. Plus, it used to be there was some bipartisanship, unlike today, there is very little, So evil, too that the Republicans that did join in the vote are getting death threats! There are some who believe that nobody in government, including most Democrats really want to end voter confusion because the gravy train they are on is what it's all about. As long as things continue as they are, they're good! The media agrees!
The big difference, in my opinion, is that the Democratic party and a good percentage of independents support policies that benefit the good of the people. They accept money to influence legislation, but ultimately, answer to the people. The Republican party since Ronald Regan has been the party of transferring wealth to the wealthy. Their idea of capitalism is that value flows to the top first (the capital holders) and they deploy some of it wisely to create more value, mostly by employing those that don't have capital. Therefore, most of the wealth (value) stays at the top, and what they trickle down is in just enough proportion to keep the system working for them. Distributing value to the non-capital holders never occurs to them, and frankly is anathema . Only a small percentage of the productivity gains of this country of the past 40 years had been shared with 90 percent.
The Supreme Court ruling on the Second Amendment in 2008, which for the first time in over 200 years said the amendment was about individual gun rights and not "well regulated militias," also allows states to ban the carrying of guns in public places (pp, 55-56.) New York State is legally right to regulate this. I can't believe the colssal ignorance of the SCOTUS decison in this country, which also allows states to ban guns to felons and the mentally ill, to regulate gun sales, and to ban "dangerous weapons." The NRA and gun rights advocates are completely wrong on these issues.
Those of us old enough to remember the diagramming of sentences in 8th grade English class will appreciate the fact that the 2nd Amendment cannot be diagrammed. It's a prime example of unnecessary ambiguity in law, and this ungrammatical amendment has led us to where we are today: mass shootings, vigilantism, and the Rittenhouse verdict.
There is a way to look at this that makes sense.
The right wing of the Republican Party really studied Lenin’s vanguard party success during the Cold War. What they have developed within the Republican Party umbrella is a vanguard party model where the policy is developed hierarchically around laissez Faire economics and then transmitted to the people who emotionally need a right wing cause to explain why they can’t get ahead in society or to protect what they have against the people who might take it away who are obviously in this world minorities favored by liberals.
So the idea that we should come together presupposes common interests when what is really going on is that the middle stratum of the working class and even the sons and daughters of the educated white collar upper middle class are being declassed and are losing their entitlement to a bourgeois existence. This is the mass base for Fascism.
So without resolving the underlying economic problems you cannot get the unity you are looking for. You have to undermine the appeal of the highly organized billionaire funded technologically adept vanguard party organized right to those being ground up by modern capitalism.
So this is why reforms that restore the middle class as embodied in the original BBB are so important.
People do not naturally gravitate toward violence stirred up by right wing fanatics. But Washington Democrats are so corrupt they won’t get the message.
We need reforms now or we are definitely headed towards fascism. You can’t put lipstick on a pig and sell it to the public. What the donor class in Washington is doing to the Democratic Party needs to be recognized and stopped. Where are the party elders to make this happen before it’s too late?
I agree with you but wanted to delve into something a little deeper. The statement "middle stratum of the working class and even the sons and daughters of the educated white collar upper middle class are being declassed and are losing their entitlement to a bourgeois existence" is one I wanted to discuss. It is my sense that these folks vote democrat not republican. Do you disagree? It is my sense that it's the poor white rural folks that vote Republican PLUS the very very wealthy at the top / corporate interests. Anyone know if this is the case? This is important because we need to properly understand who it is that we need to unite.
My sense is that blue collar workers that moved into the middle class and now see their gains threatened are voting Republican but will switch back if real reforms come out of Washington, the suburban upper middle class will vote Republican unless their children convince them otherwise (global warming) and the big problem for Democrats will be younger voters and those disgusted with corporate Democrats and the obvious corruption of Washington not showing up at the polls. You can’t expect miracles. If those voter rights bills don’t pass we have nothing to talk about. Otherwise it’s all about reforms.
You have crazy Carville and self satisfied Dems still running around attacking reform and thinking that fiscal stimulus is either more than enough or about to produce general prosperity. Biden needs to go after inflation not by yielding to austerity but by going after speculation. Fed induced austerity measures will be fatal to Democrats. New generation candidates are needed. The roadmap is there if there is any leadership left in the Democratic Party.
to challenge this thinking a bit so we can get this right: it is my sense that suburban upper middle class vote democrat, at least on the coasts (CA and NY). I agree with the blue collar workers feeling threatened (and believe we need to address these concerns because they're human concerns) and hope you are right about them switching back if we see real reforms. Yes, new generation candidates are needed that can unite those in the bottom 95%.
Is it possible that those who invest in stocks are voting Republican? I have family members who say they are opposed to the extreme right (as in Trump followers), yet they seem to believe that the stock market is stronger when they are in power. this is my own limited theory based on a few family members and clients.
You have discovered one of the ways working people believe that Republicans will help them get ahead—- investing in the stock market. But doing that and assuming Republicans will make you more money when they are in power is an illusion. Republicans in power work for the top 1%. Look at their tax cuts, look at carried interest, look at the tax loopholes for getting the companies they control to give them stock options which they can use to become extremely wealthy with no risk whatsoever. There are billionaires that pay a lower tax rate than your family members because all of their income is capital gains not salary. So the idea that helping Republicans to get into power is good for your investments is an illusion. The stock market is a casino. Almost every company has hundreds of millions to billions of shares. How many do your friends and relatives own? I’ll bet that most of them are living off their labor which is the only asset they have to sell. They are working people and they do not belong to the 1% that own this country and live off of allocating capital.
I do not believe that the stock market is a good deal for myself or any small investor. Never have. But I have a conservative brother who has made significant money that he needs for his present retirement status. He is a believer. Also a staunch Catholic. I know that 2008 hurt him. But he worships the 'free market' and is a true believer, even though it hurts. Go figure!
You can ask your brother why he has to invest in the stock market? Is it because he knows he will need money for medical care as he ages? Is it because if he lives long enough he will need someone to assist him in preparing meals and continuing to live as he is accustomed. Then tell him about the rest of the “civilized” world. Take Israel, just as an example. A 90 year old there can get someone to live in their house and provide them with care with state sponsorship so that the cost is minimal and can come out of their pension. Here in the US no pensions only casino 401ks, no advanced healthcare so no assisted living so you pay it out of your pocket. So good luck to your brother with the free market in his old age. You might point out to him that Inc free market system once you cannot produce through your labor for your employer you are a cost on the balance sheet. You are a liability to a capitalist system. Our fee for service s healthcare system is only interested in depleting your assets. Stealing your money basically. So good luck to him with his current strategy for survival. In Israel, hardly a socialist state, you can live to be 97 with all of this assistance and not deplete any of your assets for medical care. Your brother should understand this before he finds out the hard way. Our current system if healthcare care has only one objective—take away your money. Our economic system wants your brother to think he can survive on his own resources. The fact is he can’t. Take away social security and Medicare, which the Republicans will do and he will have nothing to give his descendants. One major illness without Medicare and you go broke. In Israel when the 97?year old does he can leave his i encumbered house to his children. And by the way there is no student debt in Israel because college education is practically free. And that is just one example from a capitalist country which has its problems but hasn’t turned its working class into free market zealots eager to give their billionaires all of their assets to “preserve their liberty”.
My brother retired a few years ago as did his wife. One of the reasons he is 'conservative', in addition to his financial outlook, is that he is 'pro- life' and will support any candidate with that platform.
There are only the Trump extremists in lock step and the currently in 'power' compromised Democrats (and some Independents and decent Republicans) who are stymied by the legal system that has been apparently compromised by legions of criminal lawyers. Justice does not seem to exist. What about Presidential powers? What are his options? Can he ,(will he) use executive privilege to pull this out of the fire?
It seems Trump used presidential power like it was an eat-all-you-can buffet! Why isn’t Biden doing this! Biden has reversed a lot of presidential proclamations by Trump. But that’s not enough. I am for packing the Supreme Court. People worry that it could have no end but it can be reduced or expanded as far as I know. These are desperate times.
We’re wasting very precious time.
Well forgiving student loans, aggressive anti-trust, civil rights charges against shooters, open up the oil reserves, hard talks to Democrats impeding legislation. Joe has to get it together. And all elements of the liberal wing of the party have to throw in their lot with the progressives at least as far as civil and voters rights.
I am very scared. Everyone seems to have a vocal, harsh opinion. How far is this country going to go before we fall off the edge? Do people really understand what the consequences will be?!?
For my part, and in this newsletter as well, I try to avoid overtly inflammatory words and characterizations. But I too am very scared at what may be coming as we head into the mid-terms.
Reading this blog, and the comments, I’m concerned that so many of us feel jaded and powerless right now.
How would you suggest everyday people mobilize and what would you suggest we do to counteract the movement against voters’ rights?
Thank you.
Christine
I think the solution has been presents here. We need a coalition built peaceful mass movement around the economic guts of BBB. Only the people can make the political system move. Study Martin Luther King and the Civil Rights movement. I think every segment of the Democratic Party can get behind the Lewis bill and the voter rights bill and the President has to take on th filibuster for those bi
Ready to peacefully march!
wear a protective vest!
👍🏻
The main problem I have with pro life adherents is how can you encourage young people to have children when they get pregnant and then oppose all of the measures that would make that child thrive after birth. Paid Childcare, paid family leave, free education, a livable wage are all necessary to support a family and yet the same people who are pro life are against the measures that would make children thrive. I don’t get it. Telling someone what to do with as personal a decision as bearing children isn’t something I feel anyone other than that person has the right to do. How can you do that if you take no responsibility for that child after birth?
The short answer: it's a rhetorical question. Dr. Reich is an optimist, or he would have cast it as an accurate description rather than as a question. It's all rigged by the voice of money. The underlying question is how much further things have to degenerate to trigger a major reset, hopefully something short of another civil war. And who would be out-gunned?
Unfortunately, nothing to oppose here. I've been saying for quite some time, we're in the midst of a cold civil war.
It's not just a civil war. GOP tax-cut lovers turned it into a RELIGIOUS CRUSADE when they fooled power-hungry evangelical leaders to say opposing abortion (and miniscule tax$ for Planned Parenthood's non-abortion efforts) is the only significant test of whether St Peter will allow one's soul to pass thru the Pearly Gates into Heaven.
...And, that feeding and clothing the poor have nothing to do with getting thru those Gates. Rather, those things are evil, socialist wealth redistribution!
Who benefits from a nation coming apart? The people and the politicians who make a hell of a lot of money promoting division, anger, and hate on mainstream media and social media. They are rarely held accountable or responsible for their bad behavior. Sometimes the bad behavior is even celebrated! Any blowback is countered by claiming that they are the "victim".
the big UGLY
I see the realization of Bill Maher’s Slow Moving Coup in 2024-5. Look it up on YouTube.
thank you !
"Shared psychotic disorder" is the method by which the fear-mongerers are dividing America (and we know who they are). Those subject to their method are particularly susceptible to radicalization: As children, they have been emotionally, physically or sexually abused, which makes them especially vulnerable to radicalization. It is also entirely possible that the fear-mongerers themselves were victims of such abuse. I read a credible news article online to that effect in the spring of 2017. I have not read Mary Trump's book or that of Bob Woodward. Understanding the problem is a first step toward solving it.
Please realize that today's international fear-mongerers are using advanced Artifical Intelligence tools & bots to succeed, and to destroy democracy. So, thinking the rational human intelligence can understand and address the problem may be too simplistic.
Mitch, Although I have an undergraduate minor in math, I prefer emotional intelligence skills to artificial intelligence. But thanks for your comment.
Virginia: We are humans with emotions (despite what my wife says about me!). We like to think with our emotions, and to think others act nice & play fairly. Excuse me for dropping a fancy, two-bit word, but we like to anthropomorphize our pets and our deities. Please see the 2020 movie The Social Dilemma about how A.I. exploits emotions and humanity
“If I love myself enough, loving you won’t be so rough, cause I have so much love to give the earth.” Biff Rose, The Ballad of Cliches, 1968. This is for the Putins and the Orbans and all those who have dreams of world domination.
I've watched Donald Trump since his days as a candidate when he lied about financial interests in Russia and have come to the conclusion that through his foreign policy actions, the only country he made better was Russia. He didn't want to impose sanctions when Russia took Crimea (and its ports); he chose to take Putin's denial over interference in the election over the American intelligence people; he pulled out of Syria leaving the Russian-backed dictator to carry out attacks against his own people - not to mention a nice port for the Russian navy in the Mediterranean, and - oh, that generous gift of one of our military installations we deserted - along with the Kurds; he allowed the Russians to continue their backing for Maduro (?) in South America with access to ports in the Caribbean; when the wheat deal "fell through" with China, guess who sold them the product - not 100% sure, but it was probably shipped on the brand new trans Russia-China highway that was designed primarily for commercial traffic. And now, of course, China and Russia are doing joint military operations. If you know you can't take over a country by invading it, you break it apart internally. Was this all for a Trump Tower in Moscow, or does Trump imagine himself as one of the "Big Three": Putin, Trump and Xi Zhen Ping?
This tactic has been used by the Elite since the Bacon’ Rebellion of 1676 while we were still a colony. This was a struggle between wealthy landowners and slaves as well as black and white indentured servants. The Elite decided to offer whites the perception of a social status upgrade by downgrading black rights in order to defeat their unity. It worked! It’s still working. In the end things got much worse for the blacks but nothing much changed for white workers. This outcome illustrates why an accurate history of racism in this country is such a threat to the economic Elite.
This is the part I don't get. Even the wealthy elites cannot "benefit" from a world awash in climate catastrophes, streets violent with guns, and a broken justice system that favors only white men, no matter how egregious their crime.
Putin kinda benefits (climate change affects everyone), other foreign actors that hate the US. Folks like Manchin, Zuck, Brin, et al, can't possibly see benefit in the nation coming apart.
So *why* do they support this?
of course that's coupled with the age old question of why most folks don't vote....
Maybe they're not looking that far ahead or they don't recognize the very real possibility of things getting totally out of hand or they simply they just don't care, I don't get it either. It's just totally alien to the way I was raised and the values of most of the people I've known.
Now that I had to "re-verify my email" I forgot what I was going to say.
Oh wait, it's coming back to me.
Mr. Reich, you have summoned up my political thoughts thoroughly. I am impressed you can read my mind so well. I am working hard not to lose more faith in our Democrat party. If I had the power, I'd kick those 2 rogue Democrats into the GOP cesspool they are drinking from. Better yet, deport them back to where their ancestors came from.
In spite of the big split, I believe that Congress will pass a big bold Build Back Better Plan before Christmas. We will also pass the Freedom to Vote and John Lewis Voting Rights Acts into law. Next up: We need a Police Accountability Law like we have here in Colorado. And we must amend our laws which make "self defense" a license to kill and we must finally get Gun Legislation through Congress. The Agenda is a tall order but I really do believe we can get it all done!!!!
Thank you for your optimism, it made me smile! A great summary of what's needed.
I don't deny there is a split, but in reality I don't believe that the public is split anywhere close to 50-50, as reflected in Congress. If the build back better plan is so wildly popular, but Congress is split 50-50, that simply means that we are losing the right to vote. There is no question that some people are voting against their interests due to money in politics, racism, etc., but I really do trust that Lincoln was right when he said "You can fool some of the people some of the time, but you can't fool all of the people all of the time." The most logical conclusion is that there is a problem in this country when it comes to counting votes. Understandably people are suspicious, especially when they lose an election, and demagogues such as Trump are already using this suspicion as a weapon. This is a dangerous problem but at the same time it is trivial and inexpensive to solve. Just image the ballots when they are scanned and post all the images. Then everybody can see the count. The public has to be able to count the votes for themselves so that they can verify the count. Use the power of computers to make the count transparent, not to hide the count from the public.
the banks don't have trouble with keeping track of data and dollars.
If we divide into two nations we'll be lucky. The GOP plan is to take over the entire country. Political power comes out of the barrel of a gun, said Chairman Mao, and they have learned the lesson. Additionally, GOP governors are signing bills creating their own electors, outlawing bipartisan electors, enforcing gerrymandering and voter suppression. Fox and talk radio dominate the airwaves and on social media there is no way to enforce campaign finance laws prohibiting foreign campaign funding. The mainstream media like the NYT and WSJ persist in their campaign to paint Biden and the Democrats as incompetent. So who benefits? Among others, GOP donors, financiers, Putin and his oligarchs, transnational corporations who want business restrictions eliminated, the masters of war and destroyers of earth. And what can we do?
"The mainstream media like the NYT and WSJ persist in their campaign to paint Biden and the Democrats as incompetent." t This is a good point and disturbing. I don't understand why they do this and this is why I and some people begin to believe that maybe the democrats and republicans are really just one party / backed by the same folks.
Melissa, Gore Vidal once wrote that the US was run by one party - but he was in error.
You might want to separate "the NYT and WSJ" from "Democrats and Republicans." I like making diagrams on a piece of paper to help me visualize and clarify my thoughts. If you make a box labelled Democrats and another labelled Republicans, then you can put different elements into each box. One element is the hoi polloi. The ones in the D box have different attributes from the ones in the R box, eh? And another element is the donors to each box. Are some of those donors the same in each box? Of course. Why is this? Because you've got to hedge your bets in politics and in the stock market. Does that mean that the D's and R's are but one party, even though the same moneybags give to both parties?
With all the back and forth, ups and downs with passing the BBB bills, I feel like the Democrats themselves have also been split into two parties, Conservative and Progressive.
This is what we are up against. https://gelliottmorris.substack.com/p/how-responsive-should-a-government?r=110j3&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&utm_source=copy
Thanks for sharing! It appears that gerrymandering is getting worse and worse, and sometimes it’s so extreme that I’m dismayed that the DOJ doesn’t step in. So with the money I’m saving from not eating out during the pandemic, I’ve been making monthly contributions to the ACLU to help them in their legal cases. It helps me sleep at nights.
the media just mentioned were pushing that same idea.
I guess that's the question. The same moneybags give to both parties. So, to what extent do we actually have two parties? I understand the need to hedge and am not faulting the Dems since they do need to hedge and do need money. But, it does make it appear to people like there might just be one party, and this may contribute to the apathy we have in the country of people who have given up. I am not sure, just saying that's a possibility. In addition to the fact that the same moneybags give to the same parties, it's the democrats' inability to properly communicate their messages and various other missteps that can create an impression that there is just one party. I honestly don't know at this point. There are people I trust (like Robert Reich) because they have shown that they are fighting for the greater good. As for the party as a whole, I really don't know if we have one party or two. I do know that sometimes i get the IMPRESSION that there is just one party.
Ask yourself if the platform of the Democratic Party is the same as the platform of the Republican party. Really look into that, and apply the maxim Count the Votes. And look at Opensecrets.org for how much $$ what lobbying groups give to what senators, congressmembers, and PACs.
the money they give to each party comes with strings attached. The donors want dance dates that stay with them and dance to their tune. It's bribery.
Laurie, do you know about scoring? And you might find this informative: https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120406/18051618415/is-lobbying-closer-to-bribery-extortion.shtml
It is apparently effective.
Bingo! money doesn't talk it swears.
We are under attack from other countries. Putin controls Trump, China and Iran and others are probably helping with this division that the US -CIA perfected on other countries in South America and the middle east. We divided and conquered for our power grab and greed.
It’s time Americans looked at our own disgraceful history and fully understand what is happening here.
I just listened to the news where groups are gathering to cause economic shut downs over Kyle rittenhouse committing murders and going unpunished.
We must support these protests as much as humanly possible. Be willing to sacrifice a bit to support this. We will get the repulsive republicons attention when we “grab them by the”…money!
Tell us more!
Paula, Fortunately this information is public. I would look into information (always check the source…look at their background) 1973 coup Chile (Pres Allande), 1953 Iran (PM Mossaddegh), 1954 Guatamala (Pres J Arbenz). Through our history..over 50 occurances.
For example, when I hear Guatemalans are seeking refuge in the US, knowing this history, I think we owe much support because if what WE have done to their country, as well as others. This is what people do not know! But must know to understand more clearly.
Also, please read this tiny, short book written by WWI US Brigadier General, Smedley Butler. It is titled War is a Racket.
Thank you!
I want to challenge this thinking a little bit so we can go deeper and figure out what the right step forward is. I, too, am frustrated and disgusted by some of our history, and am aware of the divide and conquer that the west (and other societies prior to the emergence of the west) used to control populations. I, too, believe there is systemic racism in our country and that there is white privilege. I, too, believe the Kyle Rittenhouse outcome is disturbing. So, we agree on a lot. HOWEVER, what I don't know is whether further division among racial lines is the answer. In other words, I believe we need to win the hearts and minds of the white rural struggling folks who feel they have been left behind AS WELL AS stop racism. Giving some white rural folks who are struggling the benefit of the doubt, they took have legitimate concerns in terms of being able to feed their families. The problem with the Democratic party right now is that we are completely ignoring these legitimate concerns. Again, I am in no way suggesting that we don't fight to end racism. I am merely suggesting that we also need to understand and empathize with those white rural folks who are struggling and figure out how to bring them along as well. To be clear, I am not suggesting we empathize with racists, but just the ones that are really struggling and are afraid of what the future holds for them. If we keep sowing the seeds of division in this country based on race, where will that leave us. We want to lift everyone up. I am concerned that we are dividing too much along racial lines. The bottom line is that the oligarchs in this country have too much power, and it's about redistributing that power and money and ending racism at the same time. So, we need to empathize with all folks who are suffering and figure out how we can all move forward together. Would love to hear other people's thoughts on this.
Melissa, we must learn this history which is not just racial but about subjugating the poor and supporting dictators over their democratically elected officials. We have supported dictators and removed their elected officials!
I have already addressed this non-sense of the constantly whining rural people who have only benefited from major implementations done by Democrats NOT Republicans! Telephone, electricity, transportation/roadways, medicare, rural hospitals, unions, farm welfare/subsidies from tax payers…all happened despite republicans voting against it.
Rural america has supported republicans for a long while now because of their racism.
We’ve spent 40 years trying the compromise route and this is where it landed.
If they can’t support those who support them, I have no sympathy.
Natives and Blacks have been waiting 445 years for a system of justice.
I support them.
Natives and Blacks have waited a very long time, I agree, and deserve our support. I will take some time to digest what you've suggested here in terms of all of the benefits that have accrued to the rural white people. You're right. They have benefitted and it's the democrats that have brought about these changes. I guess the question really is whether "Rural america has supported republicans for a long while now because of their racism.". Is it racism exactly or is it just fear and lack of understanding? Again, I don't want to overly sympathize with anyone who is racist, but I want to also empathize with the fact that it's human nature to be afraid of change. I am curious if there is some way that we can do both --- appeal to the rural white folks AND provide a system of justice for natives and blacks. I just don't see any other way. The only people who benefit right now are the top 2%. This should be a fight about fairness, equality, redistribution of wealth and power. Instead, it's become a fight about race. This BENEFITS the top 2%. We just keep fighting amongst ourselves and they're laughing all the way to the bank. It's a tough question but one I think we really need to understand and delve into so we can better move forward. In ideal world, if we could eliminate racism entirely and also give the rural white people some comfort that they will be OK, that would be the best. Then we can all move forward and get something done.
My biggest fear on this, is that we cannot overcome the broadcasting power of Fox News and frankly all of the networks owned by the right wing. Of course, there are some Democrats, progressives and all kinds of people in rural America but it has emerged as a clear support for not just Republicans but what I feel is a step further, Trumpism, which is actually authoritarian fascism.
There has been a 40 year inculcation to these people’s ears. We must find a way to explain, advertise, show these people in plain simple bullet points that all of our citizens are deserving of getting the basics in life guaranteed. Food, shelter, medical care, education. We have enough! Our military and Ultra wealthy are using our money.
Eg. You will no longer pay premiums and co-pays or ever worry about health care based on having a job.
But how on earth do we get a message to someone who says green is red, up is down etc.
Free vaccinations were introduced to save people. Approx 800k, in this country alone have died. But they are not convinced. Where does one go from there? It should be the great awakening. But it is not.
I often hear,” that will cost too much”, and it’s the perfect time to remind them of the military budget, that we all pay for.
I think perhaps ultimately, we must be brave enough to shut down Fox News and demolish monopolistic control of the media. if we want to survive as a country. Free speech doesn’t require inciting an attack on democracy.
This fear of looking like we’re inhibiting free speech can be equalized after we stop the monopoly of right wing mouthpieces as our news.
We must admit and we know there is funding and help from within Russia.
We’re in a type of war already. We have to do some things we would not normally do.
A financial lift for all Americans who are not ultra wealthy, will bring down crime and hatred and jealousies.
I agree with you. It's difficult but with so many smart people, this could be solved. The challenge is that many of the smartest PR people go into PR for the sake of corporations not the improvement of our society. We could benefit from their skills. Also, corporations spend millions each year on market research to understand their constituents. How much are we trying to really understand the needs and wants of poor rural white farmers? I am sure some are just racists, but what about the others that are scared of change. We aren't really trying to understand them (as far as I can tell). We need to lift everyone up and redistribute the wealth in our country. If it were up to me, I would send missionaries to various places to educate people. That's how religion was spread. If religion was spread 2,000 years ago without the power of internet, television, the printing press or radio then I think the message could be spread if folks did it the right way. Right now, all I see is the people again being (ironically) divided and conquered.
May I just add something I’ve felt since this newsletter began? This group can band together and *do* something. Collective action by us seems a logical outgrowth of our participation. So far I haven’t seen any support for this idea though. I guess I’ll just have to keep raising it.
I'm with you on this. I joined to not only understand more about the why's for where we are but also the how's to get to where we want to be.
To be honest, I am just waiting a little bit but am hoping for the same thing. I'd like to go back and compile all of the different ideas here onto a spreadsheet and hopefully Robert Reich can incorporate same into another book that can reach a lot of people. The key is going to be to figure out what we all agree on and where the disagreements are. As is often the case, reasonable people disagree on a lot and that prevents progress. That said, the nice thing is that many people here do seem reasonable and rational. I agree and count me in.
The other thing will be figuring out who is here to do something about the problem and who is here just to discuss.
One of the limits of Susbstack seems to be that I / you can't just @someone. So, it makes it harder to organize.
I’m sure there are ways. 😀
As usual, I think you nailed it. 2 countries: one with all the wealth and power. the other, subjects of that power. A 'free press' that misinforms the public, and an entitled, fearful, ruling class that want to protect itself at all costs. We watched the upper business classes use the military to invade other countries for 'humanitarian' reasons or to deter 'terrorism'. They went in and had secret operations to divide groups within the target country, promote confusion and chaos, until the place was on fire. Then they had a big fire sale and the capitalists went in and set up vulture capitalist enterprises. I just received a clothing item made in Vietnam. Another made in Bangladesh. It's difficult to buy American, U.S.A. made clothing.
It's almost impossible to buy Made in America nowadays. It's a sad statement on our economy.
I think there is another thing they wanted to drown in the bathtub. The middle class!
Americans are silly people. Behind all of this destruction and division in the USA is China & Russia. They are manipulating our citizens via technology. Politicians are to stupid fighting each other to see it. Why do you think many private schools are now teaching mandarin? If we don't come together soon America will be destroyed from the inside out. Just like the Roman Empire. Look at Monica Lewinsky and Kyle Rittenhouse. Both "gladiators" in the arena for the public to watch. Rome fell due to greed and stupidity. I believe in the American spirit. We can prevail. Even with our federal government to big to function and stuck in the mud. The public education system has let our next generation down. The younger generation needs to step up and voice their opinions without rioting in our streets. The old career politicians need to retire. Time for both parties to learn to compromise.
ugh!
It seems no one benefits from the nation falling apart. The rich get richer and the poor get poorer. The middle class is trying to work to pay their bills, take care of their families and give back in a meaningful way in their communities. I see this every single day in my small region.
I agree with your statement, but I do not know what can be done. Income inequality is gross. We need an overwhelming popular vote to overcome the money that distorts our political discourse with lies and disinformation?
The Congress TODAY could pass election reform to eliminate the corruption of our electoral system.
The Congress could pass a law today that corporations are not people and do not have any human rights.
They have not and will not do that because they are ALL getting rich feeding at the money trough created by the wealthy donor class.
I have stopped all donations to candidates and the DNC that accept PAC money and corporate donations.
I give what little I can afford to Inequality Media, The Lincoln Project, and the few select politicians who refuse corporate contributions.
Until we get money out of politics, nothing will change. Let’s start by outlawing paid lobbying by corporations.
See if any of us here can get an appointment to meet with our representatives in Washington D.C.
The rich in the donor class have the direct cell number for the politicians they own.
Watch the brilliant HBO series Succession to see how the game of politics is really played.
House of Cards and The West Wing were more fiction than fact. Succession takes you into the backrooms of power.
In Season 3, Episode 5, the Roy family decides who will be the next President.
In fifty years my generation has gone from “Make love, not war”, to “I’ve got mine, screw you!” We’ve all turned into our parents and our children are doomed.
That all began to "go South" during the "greed is good" meme that began circulating under Ronald McReagan. (And all the potentially good minds that ruined themselves on psychotropics.)
C'mon Tom! Speak for yourself.
To this day I haven't been able to figure out who the >he< the song references is supposed to be. I hypothesize reference to "daddy issues."
The Johnathan Edwards song "Sunshine Go Away Today" should be made the Boomers' national anthem:
Sunshine go away today
I don't feel much like dancin'
Some man's gone, he's tried to run my life
He don't know what he's askin'
When he tells me I better get in line
I can't hear what he's sayin'
When I grow up, I'm gonna make it mine
These ain't dues I been payin'
Well how much does it cost?
I'll buy it
The time is all we've lost
I'll try it
And he can't even run his own life
I'll be damned if he'll run mine, sunshine
Sunshine, go away today
I don't feel much like dancin'
Some man's gone, he's tried to run my life
He don't know what he's askin'
Workin' starts to make me wonder where
Fruits of what I do are goin'
When he says in love and war all is fair
He's got cards he ain't showin'
How much does it cost?
I'll buy it
The time is all we've lost
I'll try it
And he can't even run his own life
I'll be damned if he'll run mine, sunshine
Sunshine, come on back another day
I promise you I'll be singin'
This old world, she's gonna turn around
Brand new bells will be ringin'
Please be patient. I get what he's driving at. Sometimes the words we're used to using tie our shoelaces together for us when we try to use them. I'm none too impressed with mine own generation mine own self.
The rise of the "yuppies!"
Mitch, Yes, I know the word "anthropomorphize." Myers-Briggs personality typing includes questions for a user to answer to identify what their decision-making preference, i.e. "thinking" or "feeling," is on that particular spectrum. (I'm also more of a "thinker" than a "feeler.") Thanks for the tip about "The Social Dilemma" and AI exploitation.
History repeats itself time and time again. Social studies 101: Who has has the money? Who has the power? What will a group do to take it, keep it and enrich itself with it? Democracy, the good of the whole, has slipped away, like sand sifting through an hourglass for centuries. We have lied to ourselves as a nation about who we are. It is time that we decide that we will in fact be a democracy for the first time in centuries.
I think we need to be clear that the loss of the Rittenhouse case is more based on Wisconsin law than on the court. I am interested in your reaction to the following article published in Persuasion: " The Rittenhouse Verdict Shouldn't Have Been a Suprise." By Jesse Singal published by Persuasion. (Copyrighted so I am not sure about copying it here.)
The world is full of power-hungry Macchiavellian operators who think they are smart enough to benefit from chaos. GOP politicians, GOP Dark Money tax-cut lovers, Putin, Xi are just a few of them
I am sorry to say this but Biden's "Can't we all just get along" is as corect yet feeble as Rodney King's. By definition, nice people have an aversion to achieving their ends via power instead of persuasion. I get it. I have the same inclination. The fact is, the worst things that have happened in my life all line up with times when I should have used more power and kept trying to be "nice" and "reasonable" and "respectful". We are a split nation, and the split is more starkly frank evil versus marginal decency than ever before in my lifetime. With stakes like that, Dem leaders need to be more like the lead character, Kwai Chang Caine, in the TV show Kung Fu. He avoided conflict, took insults, ignored oppression, ... UP TO POINT, and then he used power. As I have said here before, LBJ was an ass, and he got a lot of us killed in a war we didn't know how to wage, but his strong-arming in the service of the Great Society is what we need now. A lot of the disinterest in H Clinton, and certainly mine, was an expectation that we'd just get more of the same old Washington machinations instead of the progress we so sorely need. Biden is outperforming my expectations, but still failing to control the narrative, benefit form what he, Pelosi, and others have already accomplished, and not providing the flood of accurate good news that we really need to turn the tide.
My thoughts? Trumpism is winning and I am in despair. Our only hope is winning over 2 courageous Republicans who are willing to risk political suicide for the good of the country and the world.
Is it really political suicide to do something that makes you not part of the problem, but part of the solution? We need to try any way to get some traction and this idea is a good one.
I thought that today was going to be a good day until I read this message. It looks like our own Military Complex is winning the war; People want violence, unrest, destruction, weapons of war, and who knows what else. I remember my Dad saying one time that Drugs and Politicians would be the end of America. I think he was right. . . . .
This country has been sick for many years. After many coups around the world, the CIA did one in Dallas, killing President Kennedy. WITHOUT ANY PUNISHMENT!
Still no answer. If there was an Oswald, they messed with his mind or threatened his family!
There is no “yellow peril”. There is, however, a Chinese Hong Kong peril - I.e., Taiwan’s fate. The Chinese are busy building islands and military bases in the South China Sea, along with huge increases in their naval fleet. Their intentions are very worrisome.
If I live to be 150 I will never understand racism. I just cannot comprehend why anyone would hate someone because of their race. How such a stupid thing could even exist is beyond me.
years of bad habits, bad education and absolutely no ethics!
arghh!
.....uuuuuuh, which way is up ?
Carter v. Reagan Re: Same Day Voter Registration
"It's time for universal voter registration" - President Carter
Carter sought election-day voter registration nationwide.
Ronald Reagan strongly opposed election-day voter registration.
Reagan warned that election workers would sweep through metropolitan areas scooping up what Reagan termed, "apathetic voters to keep the benefit-dispensers in power."
Vintage Southern strategy - Reagan said same day registration would "....make the GOP dead as a dodo bird."
from 2000 to 2014 there were over one billion votes cast. There were only 31 cases of voter impersonation fraud recorded.
1964 - GOP Literacy Tests Required to Vote:
https://www.crmvet.org/info/lithome.htm
Introduction: the Literacy Test System
Alabama
Voter Registration in Alabama (c.1965)
Alabama Voter Application Form (c.1965)
Alabama Voter Literacy Test (c.1965)
Georgia
Voter Registration in Georgia (c.1963)
Summary of Georgia's New Registration Law (c.1958)
It's Easy to Register! (Georgia voter registration training, the "30 Questions")
Sumter Character Test (Sumter County GA voter registration training, 1963)
SCLC Citizenship Clinic Manual: Georgia Voter Registration (c.1962)
Louisiana:
Louisiana Voter Application & Literacy Test (c.1963)
Instructions to Louisiana Registrars (c.1963 or 1964)
Negro Voting in Louisiana, Baton Rouge Committee on Registration Education. Undated (probably 1963 or 1964)
CORE Voter Training Instructions (c.1964)
Mississippi
Voter Registration in Mississippi
Mississippi Voter Application & Literacy Test (c.mid-1950s)
Literacy test questions & voting rights materials
Practice Mississippi voter registration form partially filled in by Percey Lee Brewer, February 27, 1964
South Carolina
South Carolina Voter Application (c.1964)
Voting Rights in America — Two Centuries of Struggle
"I don't want everybody to vote." "Our election leverage goes up as the voting populace goes down." - Paul Weyrich, Republican Christian conservative, one of the founders of modern conservatism. In 1977, Weyrich co-founded Christian Voice with Robert Grant. Two years later, with Jerry Falwell, he founded the Moral Majority (1979–1989).
Paul Michael Weyrich (October 7, 1942 – December 18, 2008) was an American religious conservative political activist and commentator, most notable as a figurehead of the New Right. He co-founded the conservative think tanks The Heritage Foundation, the Free Congress Foundation, and the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC). He coined the term "moral majority," the name of the political action group Moral Majority that he co-founded in 1979 with Jerry Falwell.
"OPERATION EAGLE EYE" The recent Republican Party massive GOP state legislative attempt to suppress the vote is not a new idea, but an idea that has its roots deep inside the 1964 Republican Party and conservative society.
NEW YORK TIMES HEADLINES: Nov. 3rd, 1964 -
Democrats Charge G.O.P. Poll Watch Today Will Harass the Negroes and the Poor; REPUBLICANS SAY HONESTY IS GOAL; Assert 100,000 Sentinels in 35 Cities Will Seek Only to Avert Voting Fraud
https://www.nytimes.com/1964/11/03/archives/democrats-charge-gop-poll-watch-today-will-harass-the-negroes-and.html
Democrats charged yesterday that Republican organizations across the country were preparing to “intimidate” Negro and other low‐income voters through an aggressive Election Day strategy of challenges at polling places.
Senator Hubert H. Humphrey of Minnesota, the Democratic Vice‐Presidential candidate, denounced the Republicans “Operation Eagle Eye” as an indication that the G.O.P. leadership was determined to “harass those who are going to vote.”
“It should be called Operation Evil Eye,” Senator Humphrey declared in Los Angeles.
“Operation Eagle Eye” is the Republican poll‐watching campaign under which G.O.P. officials say they will deploy 100,000 trained Republican workers at polling places in 35 large cities.
According to Charles R. Barr, national director of “Operation Eagle Eye,” these observers expect to successfully challenge or to discourage from voting 1,250,000 persons.
Republican officials denied Democratic charges that they planned to “frighten off” or otherwise discourage a large turnout in the 35 selected cities.
Mr. Barr specifically denied that “there is anything discriminatory in ‘Eagle Eye’ against any race, creed or economic status.” He is a Republican official in Chicago, where Republicans for years have alleged that voting irregularities have favored Democratic candidates.
At Republican National Headquarters in Washington, Harlington Wood, a ranking official of the G.O.P. “ballot security” program, also denounced as “ridiculous” charges that “Operation Eagle Eye” was designed to hinder the electoral process.
Mr. Wood, whose title is deputy director of political education and training for ballot security for the Republican National Committee, said the G.O.P. strategy was designed to discover “tombstone” and “vacant lot” voters—those carried on the election rolls although they have died, moved, or given false addresses.
He said that he and other top Republican officials had anticipated that when their program “appeared to be effective it would unjustifiably be attacked at the last minute.”
Reports from many of the watching points indicated that local Republican officials were preparing to implement “Operation Eagle Eye” with unusual zeal. A large turnout of voters traditionally favors Democratic candidates.
There were these reported instances of what Democratic spokesmen described sardonically as “extraordinary election security precautions”:¶Newark—Attorney General Arthur J. Sills of New Jersey announced he would assign state troopers to polling places in Essex County “in view of announced plans to challenge every voter in the city of Newark.”
The Attorney General said he was acting on a telegram from John B. Keenan, Essex County Superintendent of Elections, charging that Republicans planned “to obstruct voters in violation of the election laws.”
¶Mineola, L. I. — Lincoln Lynch, chairman of the Long Island chapter of the Congress of Racial Equality, asserted that members of the Conservative Party had been assigned to challenge voters there. Richard Coons, the Nassau County Conservative Party chairman, said there would be no widespread challenges.
But he acknowledged turning over 2,000 poll watchers' certificates to the New Yorkers for GoldwaterMiller.
¶Houston—the Federal Bureau of Investigation was asked to investigate handbills, distributed today in Negro precincts, which warned that persons convicted even of traffic offenses were liable to arrest if they cast ballots.
Throughout Texas, Republicans had mobilized about 10,000 pollwatchers.
¶Little Rock, Ark. — Winthrop Rockefeller, the Republican candidate for Governor, has said there will be a Republican poll watcher at every precinct polling place in Arkansas.
Gov. Orval E. Faubus, seeking reelection to a sixth term, has chided his opponent for this.
The Governor has written to all election officials in the state expressing his “abiding faith” in their honesty in asking their support at the polls. He said he would have no poll watchers.
¶Los Angeles and San Francisco—Mexicans and Negroes complained to election officials that they had received anonymous telephone calls warning them of challenges at the polls.
¶Washington, D.C.—Republican City Chairman Carl L. Shipley announced that 40 uniformed private detectives and more than 600 Republican volunteer workers would man the city's 91 polling places “three at a time on three shifts.”
He said that challenges in some precincts would be directed to “from 5 to 10 per cent of the voters” in this area who are voting for the first time in a Presidential election.
Mr. Shipley had said earlier that the Republican poll watchers would keep an eye out for “people who look like they don't belong in the community or are not the kind of people who would register and vote.
Democrats in the Capital charged that he meant Negroes.“
The fact is, declared Joseph L. Rauh, the Washington Democratic chairman, “that Mr. Shipley has said in plain words what the national Republican program to intimidate Negroes, low‐income families, and voters who belong to ethnic minorities has sought to camouflage in double‐talk.”
Reports from many points however, suggested that local Republican officials—and some other persons not under control of either party — were conducting the programs on their own initiative.
Agreeing that this was “probably so,” a Democratic spokesman in Washington nevertheless declared that “it does not lessen the impact on the voters.”
The strategy of many of the local plans for unusually aggressive poll watching appeared to hinge on local and state election laws. These vary from place to place, but generally speaking they make it an offense for illegally registered persons to cast a ballot.
Such laws generally bar from voting convicted felons and notorious law breakers.
But they do not cover minor offenses.
The Houston case was typical of the attempts being made to enlarge on voting regulations.
Handbills distributed in heavily Negro precincts of the city declared:
“If any voters or members of their family who are planning to vote Tuesday are wanted by law‐enforcement officials for the following offenses, information has been received that a list of voters has been drawn to be arrested after voting for the following offenses committed in the past five years:“
1. Traffic tickets.
2. Speeding or negligent collision tickets.
3. Parking tickets.
4. Child support payments ordered by the courts in divorce suits or child desertion.
5. Questioning by the police for any offense.
6. Voters who have not appeared as witnesses or defendants in criminal or civil matters.
7. Voters who have not paid fines ordered by the court.”
The handbills were signed “Harris County Negro Protective Association.” Democratic officials in Houston said there was no such organization in the area.
The publicized threat of challenges, even on a far more modest scale, was believed by some observers to be having its greatest effect among new and inexperienced voters, many of them Negroes in the South who have never voted before.
An elaborately researched Republican plan to challenge criminal convicts as they appeared at polling places was reported in some parts of Virginia. This involved painstaking advance study and comparison of voter registration, police, arrest and court records.
The effect of such a plan, if cautiously exercised, might well be to purge the voting lists of illegal voters, one Democratic spokesman said. “But the advance publicity is scaring hell out of a lot of people who are not certain of their rights,” he declared.
There was also the danger that long‐planned and public-spirited attempts to prevent voting irregularities in some localities would be blanketed with obvious excesses of Republican zeal for “Operation Eagle Eye.”
In Cleveland, for example, it was reported that Secretary of State Ted W. Brown and his staff would mount a major policing program of that city's polling places on Election Day. The “Eagle Eye” operation in Ohio was a separate, if sometimes overlapping, program.
https://www.nytimes.com/1964/11/03/archives/democrats-charge-gop-poll-watch-today-will-harass-the-negroes-and.html
We need to fully restore and reinstate the VRA of 1965 that Justice John Roberts gutted in 2013. Section Five of the VRA determined which states had to receive federal approval for their election changes. Since Roberts gutted this portion of the VRA, Republican state legislatures have passed unconstitutional election laws which categorically suppress the vote and tilt elections in favor of the Republican Party.
That's why Joe Biden must do two things:
1) stack the U.S. Supreme Court with Democratic Party U.S. Justices;
2) Direct the DOJ to file federal lawsuits challenging these 400+ unconstitutional GOP election laws. (AG Garland recently filed several lawsuits in some red states)
If Biden doesn't stack the Supreme Court with Dem Justices, Roberts and the GOP majority will surely oppose any attempt to fully restore the Voting Rights Act of 1965.
Chief Justice Roberts certainly claims he is not a racist, but is he in fact a racist? Roberts has an undeniable solid history of supporting and defending racist ideology and legislation.
John Roberts is not fit to sit on the U.S. Supreme Court, especially as the Chief Justice of the Court because racists should not be sitting on our U.S. Supreme Court.
In the spirit of racial justice, equality and the Right To Vote, I support President Biden "stacking the court" to offset and effectively neutralize the "racist vote" infecting our U.S. Supreme Court.
So you think it's too rash to call John Roberts a racist?
Do you think it's to harsh to call our current Republican majority a racist Supreme Court?
I dare you to take a look at the history of John Roberts and his hero, RACIST William Rehnquist and you tell me if John Roberts has supported and defended racist ideology and legislation:
William Rehnquist was born in 1924 and grew up in the tiny town of Shorewood, Wisconsin (less than 10,000 pop.) He joined the Army in 1943 and served during WWII from 1943-46.
After the war, Rehnquist attended Stanford University with assistance under the provisions of the G.I. Bill. While at Stanford, Rehnquist briefly dated Sandra Day O'Connor and proposed marriage to O'Connor, but she turned Rehnquist down.
In 1952 after Stanford Law School, Rehnquist became a law clerk for Justice Robert H. Jackson. While as a 28-yr. old law clerk for Justice Jackson, (1952-53) Rehnquist wrote an explosive memo as the court prepared to hear the first arguments in Brown v. Board of Education: "I realize that it is an unpopular and unhumanitarian position for which I have been excoriated by liberal colleagues, but I think Plessy v. Ferguson was right and should be re-affirmed."
A year later Rehnquist urged Justice Jackson to uphold an all-white primary for a Texas Democratic Club. Rehnquist wrote: "It is about time the Court faced the fact that the white people of the South do not like the colored people."
"The Constitution restrains them from effecting this dislike through state action but it most assuredly did not appoint the Court as a sociological watch dog to rear up every time private discrimination raises its admittedly ugly head." - William Rehnquist
“The enforcement provisions of the Civil War Amendments were not premised on the notion that Congress could empower a later generation of blacks to ‘get even’ for wrongs inflicted on their forebears,” Rehnquist wrote.
Rehnquist’s legal beliefs had a great influence on Roberts, remembered Paul Smith, a prominent civil rights lawyer who clerked at the time for Justice Lewis Powell.
Smith had known Roberts in college and clerked alongside him at the Second Circuit before they arrived in D.C. “Rehnquist reinforced John’s preexisting philosophies,” Smith said. “John was not a believer in the courts giving rights to minorities and the downtrodden. That was the basic Rehnquist philosophy.”
Clerking for Rehnquist became Roberts’ entrée to the incoming Reagan administration, where the Lone Ranger’s views were quickly embraced as the consensus among the Justice Department’s new arrivals.
On December 22, 1981, a month before the Senate began hearings on the VRA, Roberts sent an extensive memo titled “Why Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act Should Be Retained Unchanged,” to Smith for circulation to senators and their staffs.“
The House-passed version of Section 2 would in essence establish a ‘right’ in racial and language minorities to electoral representation proportional to their population in the community,” Roberts wrote. “Violations of Section 2 should not be made too easy to prove, since they provide a basis for the most intrusive interference imaginable by federal courts into state and local processes.”
Roberts’ positions put him sharply at odds with the career lawyers in the Civil Rights Division, who unanimously supported an effects test for Section 2 and personally knew how difficult it was to prove intentional discrimination.
“John seemed like he always had it in for the Voting Rights Act,” said Gerry Hebert, the deputy director of litigation in the Civil Rights Division’s voting section. “I remember him being a zealot when it came to having fundamental suspicions about the Voting Rights Act’s utility.”
Civil rights lawyers found Roberts’ claim that the House version of Section 2 would lead to quotas or proportional representation to be patently absurd.
In the seven southern states originally covered by the VRA, for example, blacks made up 25 percent of the population but held only 5 percent of elected seats.
“In a lot of cases we were talking about, there were no blacks elected,” said longtime civil rights lawyer Armand Derfner. “We were trying to get from none to some.”
***On March 1, 1982, following Brad Reynolds’s testimony, the Reagan administration won a major victory when the Senate Subcommittee on the Constitution passed a 10-year extension of the VRA that preserved the Supreme Court’s intent test for Section 2.
Strom Thurmond appeared to be on the verge of killing the House bill.
Sen. Bob Dole of Kansas, the powerful chairman of the Finance Committee, stepped in to broker a compromise. Dole advised fellow Republicans to make “the extra effort to erase the lingering image of our party as the cadre of the elite, the wealthy, the insensitive. … Our job now is to demonstrate concern to blacks and others who doubt our sincerity.”
Dole adopted the House-backed effects test for Section 2 but added a disclaimer that a lack of proportional representation was not enough to justify a Section 2 violation.
Roberts was furious. “There is no reason to change the permanent nationwide provisions of the Voting Rights Act from an intent test to a results test,” he wrote in response to an editorial praising the bill.
The Senate passed the Dole compromise by a vote of 85–8, reflecting an overwhelming bipartisan consensus for the VRA in Congress.
The House passed the Senate bill on a nearly unanimous voice vote five days later.
The extension lasted for 25 years, three and a half times longer than the 1975 reauthorization of the VRA.
My first election was in 1968...I turned 21 and was high because I could vote!!! I had already served my country in a far-away jungle and assumed that my continued involvement in a democratic society meant I would/should/could vote. Since then I have exercised my right to vote without fail...sometimes they win and sometimes they lose. What has become worrisome is the divide, the split in our political and social endeavors that has now turned 'brother against brother' ... civil war 2.0. To me, the January 6th insurrection was Fort Sumter all over again. What is truly scary is that the current political divide appears irreconcilable. Who benefits? It appears to be the right wing and the republicans have set the table and are prepared to go the distance to the precipice...
Late to the party here, but appreciating the quality of discourse! If only this space were a reflection of everyday life.
But living now in a rural burb just outside Portland, I do fear appealing to neighbors.
Emotion has dominated discourse for so long, and the commitment to violence as the way forward on the right makes this a very difficult time, getting worse.
When I speak to my acquaintances over breakfast or at the restaurants or bars, I find that what I have to say about finding accommodation to those who are different than the mainstream folk fails to register with them in a significant way. My voice and ideas not nearly as compelling as are the ideas of Tucker Carlson et al. It bugs me no end. Asking someone to think for themselves about straightforward human issues is like asking for a handout from Scrooge. There seems to be a zeitgeist that makes it "ok" to believe the worst about the "others" even though they may clearly be good and decent people. It's hard to combat that mental attitude and resistance to understanding.
We each should be unafraid to appeal to our neighbors in matters of the general welfare.
A political divide will eventually be drawn between houses unless we learn to resolve differences using the truth and common bonds and not emotional misinformation
It's just a sad time in America...hate is snowballing and the 1% are using it as a tool to maintain power and wealth. For some reason too many people refuse to educate themselves about the truth of our situation
Someone posted about the possibility of several political parties instead of two.
I don’t know exactly how it would work, perhaps like a Parliament.
Forming coalitions with The Lincoln Project, and the Green Party, for example, could help Democrats govern with a larger proportion in Congress and the Senate. It might mean giving up some power to gain more power.
How to translate the philosophy of Steve Kerr to politics? Strength in Numbers! Like the Golden State Warriors - you are playing to win, and you’re doing what the team needs you to do, even if it means sitting on the bench and being ready. Smaller parties would get rewarded with legislation or items on the party platform for their support. I suppose that’s what happens to some extent, but attracting more groups seems important.
So….I am a Republican, but I’m interested in what Mr. Reich has to say. I’ve read through a lot of the comments, but never used Substack before. I’d love to engage in meaningful dialogue, just wondering if substack is any different than other social media….
I’ll start out by saying this: Mr Reich, as well as all the commenters I’ve seen, are blaming the division on Trump / Fox News, etc.
From my side, I feel like it’s the opposite. I’m a southern, white, male, business owner, and all I see is people like me getting blamed for basically everything going wrong in the country. It doesn’t feel like all the division is being caused by the Right. Seems like it’s about 50/50 to me.
What frustrates me the most is that it doesn’t feel like anyone on the Left is open to their ideas being challenged. I can’t speak for the entire Right, but most of us detest Trump. I would guess 5 out of 50 are full blown Trumpers, the rest of us just voted for him because it was either him or Hillary.
I can admit that even though I vote Republican, I don’t think everything in the party is perfect. I see where the Left is coming from on most major issues, I just don’t agree with the solutions to those issues.
To me, it makes sense to treat politics like a marriage. We’re not going to agree on everything, but we’re stuck with each other so we’ve got to figure out how to make it work. How can we do that when we’re all so quick to label each other as “stupid Republicans” or “idiot Liberals”.
No one wants to be this divided. It’s miserable. How do we solve it and learn to compromise and at least attempt to see the others viewpoints?
I have some breakthrough ideas, Mr. Reich. I think you may be looking for a interdisciplinary approach to public policy to move forward in much more substantial ways. I am sending info in a letter to your Student Office at Berkley. Please, if you would, look for it?
Both Norman Ornstein and Ruth Ben-Ghiat do not believe that a Republican Congress will allow a Democrat who wins the Electoral College to take office.
https://twitter.com/MehdiHasanShow/status/1394805058735333380
“…America is becoming two separate nations…”
Exactly!
I think you are absolutely right, Robert. But the question that rises, again and again, is:
Will Americans do what they need to do to pull us all out of this downward spiral into Trump's hell hole? That means, of course, will they look in the mirror and see and admit to their own fears, their buried as well as blatant racism, their ever sacred misogyny and their rarely admitted classism.
That's a really tall order for Americans. Americans who live in glass bubbles. I regret to say I have serious doubt that they will.
Taking Sen Sheldon Whitehouse’s Coney Barrett confirmation hearing comments a short leap forward, plutocratic and oligarchic supported Republicans will soon secure the trifecta along with sufficient state legislatures to legally call for a constitutional convention. With all the well-placed judges and justices, and others forthcoming, to cover the actions thereof, the U S Constitution will be so rendered as to establish an authoritarian-led nation. Programs supporting people will disappear. All the folks duped by the likes of Trump will be thrown under the bus, no longer of any value to those taking over these former United States of America.
Unfortunately, I might live long enough to be emotionally dehumanized by these ogres. My offspring likely will be driven to madness.
rr
Arms dealers benefit from a nation coming apart over fear, violence, and racism.
Shall we segue to Eisenhower's Farewell Speech about the Military Industrial complex?
And finally: that movie was released in 2005 and based on a pre-existing graphic novel.
V's motivation is just the banality of revenge against individuals in that government. There's even a Tucker Carlson - or any others of that ilk - that feature prominently in the story. Compare events uncovered by the investigator in that movie with anything you have already seen come to pass. There's even a virulent disease involved. The parallel is almost breathtaking.
That's why I've been recommending V for Vendetta to anyone I think might listen. The whole movie surrounds the ruling party's strategy for coup - and its subsequent investigation. V is just a romantic anti-hero who has more "cajones" and competence than ordinary humans who gets the investigation going in the process of being investigated!
I had a naive friend who wasn't watching the news on 1/6. He posted to social media asking how to change his stock portfolio for Biden's Presidency. I told him to invest in guns & ammo, and watch the news...
Then we can follow the movie "V for Vendetta" playbook. ol' Tweety or one of his surrogates gets re-elected or elected and saves us from it all by mobilizing the military and declaring martial law - and keep it in place until the Q-publicans declare him president for life. To my mind, the answer to Mr Reich's question is pretty straight forward.
We don't have until the 2024 election. He'll be appointed to the #3 succession position in January 2023. He'll be in charge of House security during Biden's State of the Union Speech
I wouldn't have gone to that scenario had Mr Reich expressed his lack of confidence in the SCOTUS. SCOTUS is the only thing to stand in the way of anything. I forgot to include in the V for Vendetta scenario something about lifting the requirements of habeas corpus, one of the first things Lincoln did in the Civil War. Hitler insisted that France surrender in the same train care that Germany surrendered in 20 yrs earlier.
BTW: That's supposed to read "I wouldn't have gone to that scenario had Mr Reich >not< expressed his lack of confidence in the SCOTUS.
We could be the ones labeled "rebels!"
Beginning to make a horrible sense to you, is it? Hitler took that kind of career path, as well.
The movie, that is. I recommended it in the office hours concerning the Seaside Hotel.
If you think preachin' to the choir will accomplish anything, say your piece freely.
Good for you Mr. Reich. You finally identified the real culprit behind fear, violence and racism in this country - American’s criminal capitalist class. Marx was right all along. My only question: As global Armageddon approaches, where does this legion of discord expect to find customers for its mostly useless products and services?
China/Xi also benefits from Biden being a lame duck. I was chatting with my GOP brother-in-law 9 days ago, before my niece's wedding, and he said Xi will take Taiwan right after the Olympics
I would not call Biden a lame duck! Getting anything done with the uncooperative, hostile opponents is truly great.
Sadly, I think China, Russia, NKorea, Brazil, India, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Israel, and most other nations perceive Biden to be a lame duck, who is unlikely to steer permanent US policy. Sadly, Biden's few military options include giving advanced weapons to Australia, Japan, the UK and other (pseudo-) allies (that his predecessor may have insulted), so they can deploy them.
A few people have asked about us "doing something" at some point -- ie., working to make change. The challenge I see with substack is that I / you couldn't just @someone to get them involved. In other words, it's hard to organize a movement if all you can do is reply to posts. Anyone see this differently?
I was intrigued to see action yesterday (on CNN):
"Legendary Black radio host Joe Madison is two weeks into a hunger strike that could become a risk to his health. Madison, 72, is doing it for one reason: To pressure President Joe Biden and Democrats in Congress to pass voting rights legislation as the GOP actively works to restrict ballot access.
As Madison told CNN's Don Lemon on Friday, "Just as food is essential for the existence of life, voting is essential for the existence of democracy."
He’s a hero. I’m pretty sure I couldn’t do that.
I have a couple of ideas. If our fearless leader would like to make this happen he could help us organize around one or two projects. So maybe one post a week or a month would have to do with the actions to perform and discuss progress, issues, etc. Or, we could find another meeting place, which could be rather difficult. Or, we could set up a Substack just for the action group. Just a few ideas. Not sure how attractive or feasible they are.
these are all good ideas. Let's wait for Robert Reich to read all this and catch up. I am on the same page about something needing to happen in the future that translates all these ideas into action. I am really enjoying the intellectual conversations and don't want them to stop but agree that it would be good to have some action points etc.
really like the idea of one post a month being more action-oriented.
I think this limitation is to keep this from becoming Facebook with lots of trolls. Bad posters can be disinvited.
Ah, the Ciceronian twist--cui bono fuisset, right? Professor, you have long been my favorite commentator on the passing scene. If Fortuna is a "lady," there is no doubt she is <<mobile>>, as Verdi reminds us, <<qual pium' al vento>>. Our decadence can be traced clearly back to the irresponsible behavior of government during the '60s, when Jagger toasted "the wavering millions / Who need leaders but get gamblers instead." It's harvest time: We reap the whirlwind.
couldn't say it better
Our economic system, with its locus of value exclusively on $$$$, discourages the production of the next generation. Under our system as currently configured, children are a liability. So are dogs and cats -- but less expensive.
Actually, I still have Vet bills for cats that have been gone for years.
In my barber business I have had two customers in the last 6 months who were married and in their 30's. Both had wives and homes, decent jobs. Both said they were not planning to have children because of the way the world is. Climate issues and leaders like the former guy. Neither of them know each other. they just randomly came in. I live in a small city, Pop. 16,000 or so.
I'm chiming in to say: I hear you, Jill, and understand both your fear and your frustration. But if we look at this moment with a long view of history, we can see that there is a way out too.
You are correct. But, let’s not forget that through that long view there was a civil war. And, as you stated, “…America is becoming two separate nations…”, which, unfortunately, appears to be becoming an impassable divide. The Confederacy never died, it’s merely been suppressed. So, unless the “leadership” in the Republican Party does an abrupt about face I see no outcome other than another civil war.
Jane! :)
Better start planning now to leave.
Update your passport.
Still, I intend to fight for my country until the end.
✅
😄 Not a bad idea.
Nowhere to run, nowhere to hide...
Remember , dispair is not an option