He has no remorse for wrongdoings- he really thinks as president he can kill someone on 5th ave if he feels that is necessary- just like Putin killing Navalny
He has no remorse for wrongdoings- he really thinks as president he can kill someone on 5th ave if he feels that is necessary- just like Putin killing Navalny
Listening to SCOTUS arguments today, it sounds like they agree that he can kill someone in office and get away with it. The questions are pure theater. The DOJ should ask just one question. Does the president have immunity if he shoots and kills someone. That question will expose SCOTUS for what it is. trad rad Catholics They will also uphold Idaho's laws that prohibit abortion except when death of the woman is imminent In essence that is the law.
Any of us can easily predict how the court will rule on anything brought before it.
By the way the court has usurped Congress, Kavanaugh just said, that they have to write statues that will cover the future.
The constitution does not delegate writing laws to the courts.
Yes, because we have heard arguments that any challenge to the criminal greedheads will Not be "good for the country" , or "will further divide the country" . This has been going on for way too long, and look where we are now! the 'supreme court' needs to examine and wring their hands about whether the former President of the United States of America has absolute immunity! As an election draws near that, if he somehow "wins' could put US in a fascist State!
He has no remorse for wrongdoings- he really thinks as president he can kill someone on 5th ave if he feels that is necessary- just like Putin killing Navalny
Listening to SCOTUS arguments today, it sounds like they agree that he can kill someone in office and get away with it. The questions are pure theater. The DOJ should ask just one question. Does the president have immunity if he shoots and kills someone. That question will expose SCOTUS for what it is. trad rad Catholics They will also uphold Idaho's laws that prohibit abortion except when death of the woman is imminent In essence that is the law.
Any of us can easily predict how the court will rule on anything brought before it.
By the way the court has usurped Congress, Kavanaugh just said, that they have to write statues that will cover the future.
The constitution does not delegate writing laws to the courts.
Yes, anything he does to harm others is no big deal. But even the Thought that he should suffer consequences is very unfair, in his estimation.
And he whines to Congressional Republicans that they should stop the criminal trials "for the good of the country." Can you imagine the chutzpah?
Yes, because we have heard arguments that any challenge to the criminal greedheads will Not be "good for the country" , or "will further divide the country" . This has been going on for way too long, and look where we are now! the 'supreme court' needs to examine and wring their hands about whether the former President of the United States of America has absolute immunity! As an election draws near that, if he somehow "wins' could put US in a fascist State!