Listening to SCOTUS arguments today, it sounds like they agree that he can kill someone in office and get away with it. The questions are pure theater. The DOJ should ask just one question. Does the president have immunity if he shoots and kills someone. That question will expose SCOTUS for what it is. trad rad Catholics They will also u…
Listening to SCOTUS arguments today, it sounds like they agree that he can kill someone in office and get away with it. The questions are pure theater. The DOJ should ask just one question. Does the president have immunity if he shoots and kills someone. That question will expose SCOTUS for what it is. trad rad Catholics They will also uphold Idaho's laws that prohibit abortion except when death of the woman is imminent In essence that is the law.
Any of us can easily predict how the court will rule on anything brought before it.
By the way the court has usurped Congress, Kavanaugh just said, that they have to write statues that will cover the future.
The constitution does not delegate writing laws to the courts.
Listening to SCOTUS arguments today, it sounds like they agree that he can kill someone in office and get away with it. The questions are pure theater. The DOJ should ask just one question. Does the president have immunity if he shoots and kills someone. That question will expose SCOTUS for what it is. trad rad Catholics They will also uphold Idaho's laws that prohibit abortion except when death of the woman is imminent In essence that is the law.
Any of us can easily predict how the court will rule on anything brought before it.
By the way the court has usurped Congress, Kavanaugh just said, that they have to write statues that will cover the future.
The constitution does not delegate writing laws to the courts.