7 Comments
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
Gina's avatar

This may be true of all/most/some Representatives and Senators. (I’m not sure because I haven’t done the research on all the states.) However, it unfortunately does not apply to the office of the President which is under federal jurisdiction.

Expand full comment
Laurie Blair's avatar

yes, with the voters weighing in, hopefully, in a "free and fair election". We had a remedy against traitors, and lawlessness ; The 14th amendment section 3 ; the disqualification

clause! I don't know if there is a challenge to the way the Supreme Court MAGAs just ignored that . It would be concerning if they can just get away with trashing settled law and nullifying the Constitution.

Expand full comment
Robert's avatar

We have a remedy against tyranny also. November 5th, 2024.

Expand full comment
Laurie Blair's avatar

Yes ; that is what I wrote ; "with the voters weighing in"; But the remedy against having a traitor on the ballot was there, as I stated. 14th amendment. The "Supreme Court" discarded the remedy provided in the Constitution to remove disabled traitors from their seats in government and on the bench of the Supreme Court, and federal courts.

Expand full comment
Robert's avatar

Traitor now?

Don't get too far out over your skis.

Expand full comment
Laurie Blair's avatar

Robert I don't ski ; and just because there are clearly flaws in the rules of eligibility for office, the fact that you are a MAGAt is evident!

Expand full comment
Laurie Blair's avatar

Robert ;If the MAGATs 'win', you will find out that their "remedy" against tyranny is not all it's cracked up to be.

Expand full comment