Whom do you trust more with TikTok — China, or American billionaires?
Whom do you trust more with TikTok — China, or American billionaires?
I don’t trust either. Congress needs a totally different approach to giant social media platforms.
Friends,
Should you be more worried about China siphoning off your personal data and manipulating your thoughts via TikTok, or American billionaires siphoning off your personal data and manipulating your thoughts via TikTok?
Personally, I don’t trust either.
Which is why the current brouhaha in Washington over the fate of the popular platform is utterly beside the point.
Rich Americans now lining up to buy TikTok, if the Senate goes along with the House and bans the platform from our shores as long as it’s owned by Chinese investors, include a hit parade of irresponsible billionaires — such as the corrupt former Trump Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, Trump lapdog investor Kevin O’Leary, and right-wing megadonor Bobby Kotick.
Not to forget multibillionaire Republican megadonor Jeff Yass, who already owns a $15 billion (yes, billion) stake in TikTok’s parent company, ByteDance.
Yass is the biggest Republican donor in the 2024 election cycle so far, having spent $46.4 million. (He was the fourth-largest donor in the 2022 midterms, spending $56.2 million. In 2020, he donated $25.3 million, all to Republican candidates.)
According to ProPublica, Yass has focused on candidates pushing for lower taxes, charter schools, campaigns against so-called critical race theory, abortion bans, and candidates who deny Biden won the 2020 election.
He also spends on Trumpish “think tanks.” In 2020, he donated $20.7 million to the Club for Growth. And he and one of his partners, Arthur Dantchik — who, not incidentally, sits on the board of ByteDance — are responsible for a large portion of the donations to the Kohelet Policy Forum, a conservative right-wing Israeli think tank.
Not surprisingly, Yass has given generously to politicians who have opposed restrictions on TikTok. And his Club for Growth is right behind him.
After Trump recently attended a donor event in Palm Beach, organized by the Club for Growth, he reversed his position and said he opposed the TikTok ban.
The Club for Growth has also hired former Trump aide Kellyanne Conway to lobby lawmakers to oppose the ban. Vivek Ramaswamy also reversed himself after a super PAC supporting his failed bid for the Republican nomination received money from Yass.
Yass is not the only big American investor who has already plunked down billions for pieces of TikTok. The Carlyle Group, KKR, and General Atlantic have all invested, according to data provider PitchBook.
The contretemps over the TikTok ban shows the power of America’s billionaires over public policies, even policies purporting to protect national security. It also shows the global reach of American billionaires over giant corporations, regardless of where they are headquartered — even ones like ByteDance that appear to be linked to the Chinese government.
True, America’s billionaires aren’t in a global race with the United States for world dominance. But they’re in a race with the rest of America to dominate the United States — a race which should be of no less concern. The lure of unfathomed wealth can be as corrosive to the common good as a competing nation’s determination to beat us.
We need to have a totally different conversation about TikTok — as well as the other giant platforms now scraping up our personal data and feeding us dangerous lies. Is TikTok really any more worrisome than X (formerly Twitter), Google, Facebook, and Amazon, and their billionaire owners?
The real issue here isn’t whether China or some American billionaire should own these platforms. It’s how to make them publicly responsible, regardless of who owns them.
These social media platforms have become so large and powerful they should be treated as public utilities or common carriers — and regulated in the public interest.
That’s my two cents. What do you think? (Here’s my interview with Joy Reid on MSNBC last night, on the subject.)
I agree with Professor Reich 100%. These influential platforms should be public utilities and not platforms for billionaires to siphon off even more information about me or anyone who utilizes a platform to communicate.
Dr Reich, I agree 100% but I think that the conversation needs to be widened. A signal feature of the US of the past 40-45 years is the yawning inequalities that have opened up between the very rich and the rest of us. Of course, it is not a problem just for the USA but increasingly for the world. But as in so much, what happens in America often starts trends. Hence, reversing a negative trend would be a positive good for both America and the world. Basically, taxes need to be re-progressivized. Biden is talking about some steps (the billionaire tax) in the right direction and that is great but this needs to become a movement, to make sure it happens. And somehow it has to become a world movement, so that the super-rich cannot simply flee from high tax countries to those with more regressive (low taxes for the rich) systems. How all this can be done is super-difficult but it needs to be done and the first step is having big conversations about it. Dr Reich, do you agree and if so can you devote a column or two to it?