Friends,
Democrats will retain control of the Senate, and maybe even the House.
There was no red wave. But there was no blue wave, either.
Americans chose not to make any more waves.
This was not a change election. It was a stability election.
Even though President Joe Biden’s approval rating on Tuesday averaged 41 percent, and 72 percent of Americans said the country was headed in the wrong direction, at least for now Americans have chosen steadiness over tumult.
The past few years have been too hair-raising: Four wild years of Trump, two horrible years of pandemic, a deep recession followed by steep inflation, climate catastrophes, a violent attack on the U.S. Capitol, a rogue Supreme Court untethered from precedent and eager to take away reproductive rights assumed sacrosanct for almost fifty years, a war in Ukraine where the Russian president speaks of using nuclear weapons.
Americans want to keep politics pretty much as is because everything else is so unpredictable.
This is bad news for Trump and Trumpism – the quasi-religious personal cult of authoritarianism, political violence, and QAnon conspiracy theories that Trump has fostered, whose fundamental goal is to upend American politics with Trump at its head.
There will be no upending.
In fact, as the dust now settles, it appears there was only one clear loser last week: Trumpism.
As a result, the next two years leading up to the 2024 election are less likely to pose a terrifying threat to American democracy. (They may still be terrifying, though.)
Notably, not a single election-denying candidate at the state level for secretary of state – the people who would have overseen the 2024 elections – was elected.
In Pennsylvania, an election denier who would have had the power to appoint the secretary of state lost his bid for governor. In Wisconsin, an election denier’s loss in the governor’s race blocked a move to put election administration under partisan control.
Nor were two of the most notable Trump-endorsed election-denying senate candidates elected, Mehmet Oz in Pennsylvania and Blake Masters in Arizona.
Trump himself did not help the Republican cause. His conspicuous stream of invective, bigotry, and election denialism reminded many voters of what the Republican Party threatened if it regained power.
Given all this, Trump’s expected announcement on Tuesday that he’s once again running for the presidency is hardly good news for the Republican Party — although, presumably, Trump couldn’t care less.
The next two years won’t be as dangerous as they might have been had Trump’s picks been elected, but they will still be filled with his divisive belligerence.
At least some political stability will prevail.
Biden will continue to fill the federal courts with judges likely to protect the Democrats’ major legislative accomplishments (including previous achievements such as the Affordable Care Act, Medicare, and Social Security), as well as voting rights and reproductive rights (as far as the Supreme Court leaves them room).
If any of the current Supreme Court justices dies, Biden will have a clear shot at filling the vacancy with someone more amenable to Democratic (and democratic) values.
Meanwhile, Senate Republicans won’t be able to do what House Republicans are almost certain to do if they gain a majority – launch a series of hearings and investigations to embarrass Biden and his administration over everything from the withdrawal from Afghanistan to Hunter Biden’s laptop.
Thanks to Americans’ preference for stability over tumult, Georgia’s December 6 runoff between Democratic Senator Raphael Warnock and Republican Herschel Walker will no longer determine control of the Senate -- and therefore no longer invite a media circus and cesspool of campaign money.
If Warnock prevails, the real loser will be West Virginia’s Joe Manchin – who will lose effective control over the Democrats’ senate agenda because Democrats will gain a 51-49 majority that shifts the balance of power to Manchin’s left.
The other change if Warnock wins is that Senate committees will no longer be evenly split between Democrats and Republicans. Democrats will gain majorities on them, with the result that Biden’s nominees and Democrats’ bills won’t be deadlocked in committee, requiring time-consuming floor votes to resolve.
But if Republicans prevail in the House, even by one or two votes, Democrats’ senate bills won’t go anywhere, anyway.
Perhaps that’s what Americans have opted for. After years of tempest and tumult, it may be that most of us want nothing more dramatic than a competent government that acts reasonably and carefully — and doesn’t make any waves.
It seems that American democracy was saved by women voters and young voters.........The Democrats and us "boomers" owe them ...............
The election(s) was/were a relief, given what the pundits were predicting. But your final paragraph treats "us," "Americans," as if we are a single person who just made a single action. ("Perhaps that’s what Americans have opted for. After years of tempest and tumult, it may be that most of us want nothing more dramatic than a competent government that acts reasonably and carefully — and doesn’t make any waves.") No, we Americans voted for very strongly opposite things/candidates in most instances. The votes were Very Close in instances that gave wildly divergent options. We are a very divided country.
I hope the Democrats will come up with more candidates who can appeal to working people. We can't expect to reproduce Fetterman—he's a unique man. But I hope his appeal and his ability to win even in the face of a terrible health challenge convinces the powers-that-be in the Democratic Party that continuing to foist candidates whose main commitment is to Wall Street oligarchs is not a winning plan. President Biden has governed in a far more sensible way than I, frankly, had expected (although he could not pass many of his programs because of his small legislative majorities). One important point was his making Bernie Sanders a key member of his cabinet. If Biden does not run again (and I'll be happy if he does run again), the candidate must not be one of those pretty faces whose heart belongs to Wall Street. And they abound in the wings, getting ready to run. That mistake could cost the country big-time.