King Charles III

Britain’s projection of its hopes and gossip on its royal family may be more useful than America’s projection on its presidential families

Friends,

Today’s coronation of King Charles III, with all its pomp and pomposity, signals something special about the relationship between the Brits and their royal family. For it is in fact their royal family — not just a symbol of what remains of the British Empire but a living, breathing, soap opera of a family that in the minds of many Brits represents modern-day Britain.

The British monarchy is an archaic vestige of the country’s feudal past. Some argue that it should be dispensed with altogether. I’m in sympathy with this argument, but I wonder if it misses something.

It is surely bizarre for one of the world’s major democracies of the 21st century to cling to the fiction of royalty (and it is indeed a fiction — King Charles III has no tangible political power). But it’s a relatively harmless fiction — and one that arguably meets the needs of people to gossip about, project upon, and vicariously live the lives of a storybook family that tries to be of service to the nation.

Here in America, many of us romanticize our presidents and their families, at least at the start of an administration. Remember Camelot?

American’s projection of its hopes and fears on presidents and their families poses a larger danger than Britain’s projection on its royal family.

Because our presidents head the executive branch of the government, the two roles — the projected glamor and the political reality — often get confused, leaving us disappointed if not disgusted.

After Camelot came Lyndon Johnson, who pulled up dogs by their ears. And then, eventually, Donald (“When you’re a star, they let you do it. You can do anything. Grab ‘em by the pussy. You can do anything.”) Trump.

Britain’s government may seem drab and boring (Boris Johnson notwithstanding) but is at least free to do its boring best.

Here, we demand that our presidents and their spouses throw formal balls and state dinners, decorate the White House like a castle, appear in person at every major national anniversary or memorial or funeral, and always symbolize the nation.  

I’m not suggesting America have a royal family. It’s just that Britain’s infatuation with its own may have some social utility there that we Yanks don’t understand.  

What do you think?