317 Comments
User's avatar
Melissa Eustace's avatar

Only five Rs opposed him?!? I mean, I’m grateful, but that means what - 48 or so supported him? 😳

Expand full comment
Scott Stroud's avatar

They probably drew straws. I don't think any of them have the nerve to do it on their own

Expand full comment
Christine's avatar

Not true, Rand Paul was the only Republican Senator not invited to the White House for lunch! Just saying!

Expand full comment
Ruth Sheets's avatar

Trumpidy-doo-dah was hoping that would intimidate Paul. He was wrong. I am grateful Paul has found some backbone lately. I wish we knew if it would last and that it is permanent.

Expand full comment
Susan Troy's avatar

Rand Paul should consider himself lucky. Lunching with this bunch might cause serious indigestion. It might even include a Putin pudding...

Expand full comment
Phil M.'s avatar

Isn't Rand Paul a libertarian? I read Reason magazine, and they do not like Trump at all.

Expand full comment
Susan Garrity Benton's avatar

Phil, I’ve noticed Rand Paul is actually saying reasonable things lately. Who knows if it will last. I think Libertarians

became Magas, or at least many of them did. Senator Paul may finally get

that they’ve gone too far. Or maybe it’s DT’s 100% insensitivity to what we call civilized behavior that bothers Paul. We’ll never know. But one thing is certain—this country is on a very dangerous path that could seriously

disrupt all of our daily lives.

Expand full comment
Porter Rockwell's avatar

Rand Paul should watch his six. Trump could do an Ernst Rƶhm on him.

Expand full comment
Victor's avatar

The Cato INstitute has fretted about the imperial presidency for a long time, but libertarians in the Heritage Foundation think that a "temporary" emperor is need to destroy the "deep state." They are delusional.

Expand full comment
Pamela S.'s avatar

What exactly is meant by the "deep state "? I see the term used disparagingly but to my mind it appears to be undefined.

Expand full comment
Susan Garrity Benton's avatar

Pamela, As far as I know the ā€œdeep stateā€ is a fantasy conjured up by republicans

Expand full comment
Wayne Brehaut's avatar

"Deep state is a term used for (real or imagined) unauthorized and often secret networks of power operating within a government but independently of its political leadership, in pursuit of their own agendas and goals." -- Wikipedia

But there are legitimate uses of the term or similar terms as you can find by searching for "what are some examples of real 'deep state' groups or activities".

Or just read the Scientific American article at https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/state-secrecy-explains-the-origins-of-the-deep-state-conspiracy-theory/

Expand full comment
Ruth Sheets's avatar

Pamela, it is deliberately vague because there is no "deep state on the Democratic side." It is just another figment of Republican imagination to scare and intimidate people they don't like. The closest thing we have as a "deep state" to me would be the Heritage Foundation and similar con "think tanks where as little thinking and a lot of undermining of our government are going on. That is truly scary. They have already nearly imposed project2025 on a people that does not want it. That's pretty deep!

Expand full comment
Frederick J Frahm's avatar

The ā€œdeep stateā€ that conservatives so despise is merely government employees performing their duties as per the relevant statutes and administrative rules, as opposed to conservative political operatives.

Expand full comment
Ruth Sheets's avatar

Victor, you are right about so many in the country, particularly Libertarians being delusional. That is probably because the Libertarians are focused nearly exclusively on themselves, their personal rights, and how to keep from participating positively in society, or at least that is how I understand it. Hiding one's head under a basket as many have done gets one nothing good.

Expand full comment
Victor's avatar

Libertarians differ from liberals in their claim that the state has no right to impose responsibilities on them. Conservative anarchists at heart they know that they cannot survive without strong state protection. In his Afterward to The Road to Serfdom, titled Why I am not a Conservative, F. Hayek, once a libertarian darling, warned that conservatives, due to opposition to change and lack of principle, have an extremist tendency. Some of them are good critics of government programs, but they have nothing positive of their own to solve social problems. Margaret Thatcher, one of their great heroes, even claimed that there is no such thing as "society,"

Expand full comment
steve reed's avatar

They may get instead a true deep state that runs roughshod over everyone, including the Heritage Foundation. But people don't see these things.

Expand full comment
Victor's avatar

Indeed. They ought to learn from the Russian experience.

Expand full comment
Susan Iwanisziw's avatar

Thiel and most of the Silicon Valley crowd are Libertarians and don’t believe in Democracy. They may hate Trump but hate voters with voices more.

Expand full comment
Phil M.'s avatar

Good to know. And I am not at all surprised. The "Tech-bros", or "broligarchs", are just like Musk. They believe they are somehow superior to everybody else. I used to live out there and knew quite of few nerds, back before the dot.com bubble burst. Many of them are like Idiot-savants, except without the savant part.😁

Expand full comment
Charles's avatar

Fair enough!

Expand full comment
Penny Pawl's avatar

Marjorie was invited????

Expand full comment
Ada M Prill's avatar

MTG is not in the Senate.

Expand full comment
Penny Pawl's avatar

Opps!!!!!

Expand full comment
John S's avatar

It wasn't an open or even closed floor vote. These were 5 Republicans who voted to not forward the nomination out of committee.

Expand full comment
Charles's avatar

I commend them for their courage. A flash of integrity is a sea of spinelessness.

Expand full comment
Ruth Sheets's avatar

Charles, alas, a tiny flash of integrity which may or may not go further.

Expand full comment
Evelina Giobbe's avatar

Courage? Courage is going to work every day facing the possibility of being abducted by masked ICE agents. Courage is going to Temple to worship not knowing if some armed anti-Semite will rush in and start shooting. Courage is NOT simply voting against a self-professed Nazi sympathizer. That’s their job in Congress. No round of applause from me.

Expand full comment
Charles's avatar

Evelina, I see where you are coming from and I don't disagree with you. I felt it is appropriate to recognize the few Congressional Republicans who, for once, stood up to Trump and the regime.

Expand full comment
Wayne Brehaut's avatar

And by "is" I assume you meant "in"?

Expand full comment
Melissa Eustace's avatar

Thanks for clarifying

Expand full comment
Charles's avatar

I'm well aware of that. I've been watching this group of clowns for years. I think we need to recognize it when they actually do the right thing. It may encourage them to do it again; although, I'm doubious.

Expand full comment
Karl Newton's avatar

I'm not particularly impressed [read: AM disappointed] by numbers of the Democratic Senators - my own "Leader Schumer", chief among them - and wonder how close You, Charles, may be to seeing little difference in the top party office holders?

Expand full comment
Gail T's avatar

Does that mean there will be no public record of the vote - unless the media makes it known?

Expand full comment
Gail T's avatar

Still watching their backs... and their jobs?

Probably enough - the bare minimum - did the right thing and stopped him getting the job!

Phew... could dodge that bullet, too! Lucky day for me!

Expand full comment
Paul Cesmat's avatar

Perhaps they're holding out for an even lower life form? There's still a few at the bottom of the barrel at Fox.

Expand full comment
David Gardiner's avatar

Barrel's empty, Paul, but the cesspool is overflowing. It won't take long.

Expand full comment
fayham's avatar

Or 48 are more afraid of being seen as disloyal to the president than adding a very dangerous man to special council.

Expand full comment
Charlie Hardy's avatar

And do not hold your breath (just your nose) cos the large female has yet to sing regarding this stormtrooper's nomination. 5 may become 0 b4 long (after a few calls overnight)?

Expand full comment
Farhad Malekafzali's avatar

48 Nazis. At least we now know.

Expand full comment
Joe H's avatar

Yeah, progress is slow with the GQP. Trump is a liability to their political future. The numbers will grow.

Expand full comment
Beth Gallagher's avatar

I didn’t think they had one — based on their actions since Jan 25. This is definitely good, but too little and too late. Maybe it’s because the guy was so prominently anti-Semitic. That’s the only deplorable behavior they pretend to care about anymore. Everything else is A ok.

Expand full comment
Shelley Riskin's avatar

Yes. This Nazi regime/ennablers don't care at ALL about real anti-Semitism. They're using our Jewish community as a smokescreen for bludgeoning universities, schools, blue states, etc; to get the power the Criminal-in-Chief wants over them. He'll turn on us sooner or later (and in fact, he's pulled millions allocated for synagogue security, which would actually help, and is so needed these days, but which costs a fortune!)

Expand full comment
Shelley Riskin's avatar

The Criminal-in-Chief has embraced the most rabid anti-Semites, from Kanye West to many others, and in all my years, I've never seen a President do such a thing. It's beyond frightening. And clearly, many people do think that he cares about Jews. No. He does not.

Expand full comment
Beth Gallagher's avatar

Totally agree that the right wing and MAGA are antisemitic at their core and it’s a serious and scary issue. But they do ā€œperformā€ anti-antisemitism when it works for them. That’s all I was saying. They don’t even perform being anti-racist or anti-misogynist.

Expand full comment
Pamela S.'s avatar

"Perform" is the perfect verb, Beth.

Expand full comment
Robert's avatar

ā€œin all my years, I've never seen a President do such a thing.ā€

You really haven’t been paying attention. Think of Obama and Farrakhan.

Expand full comment
Louise Purfield-Coak's avatar

Just as drugs and crime are a smoke screen for placing his goon squad called ICE plus the National Guard in our cities and towns. Now he is using the same smokescreen to gin up a war with Venezuela so he and his buddies the oil tycoons can seize the massive Venezuelan oil reserves, the largest in the World.

Expand full comment
Anon's avatar

Louise - Well, they did take down a really big/bad criminal when ICE in Oregon assaulted and manhandled a 4 foot 6 inch blind man. They must be so proud of themselves.

Expand full comment
L B Bowen's avatar

Or, he wants a full blown war in Venezuela to get the military out of the country while he declares martial law and imprisons his critics in hellholes in Africa. Apparently the Venezuelan army is much more powerful than the administration is claiming and thousands of American soldiers would die in an unnecessary war.

Expand full comment
Louise Purfield-Coak's avatar

Just to be clear that is what the military Brass my be thinking. After all, the four star General charge of the Southern Command says he is retiring before the end of the year, wanting no part of this war. The other reason besides wanting the oil, is he thinks it will give him a get out of jail free card as he has America rally around the flag pole! After all, it works for Putin and Netanyahu! All of them vile.

Expand full comment
Dale Greer -- Dagnar's avatar

IMO a kind of replay to the run up to the Iraq/Afghanistan war. WMD ??? nah - to protect the flow of oil from Iraq and through the pipelines through Afghanistan ~

[[maybe???]]

Expand full comment
Beth Gallagher's avatar

I completely agree and have edited my comment to say that they ā€œpretend toā€ care about antisemitism

Expand full comment
Shelley Riskin's avatar

Thank you, Beth, I appreciate your response, and have also edited my original reply.

Expand full comment
Ted Myers's avatar

Once again I'd like to point out that there is a BIG DIFFERENCE between Judaism and Zionism. The people in the far-right Israeli government who want to wipe Gaza off the map are Zionists. That's the Jewish version of Nazis.

P.S. I am of Jewish ethnicity. I can't help that. But the persecution of other, non-Jewish ethnicities as repugnant to me as the Nazis. Hasn't anyone learned anything from WW II?

Expand full comment
Dennis King's avatar

Well said, Shelley. It's like all the acolytes to Agent Orange in the House and Senate are members of drumpler's "very fine people" on the Nazi side of the street, and that goes double for Herr j d "wanze". If those five senators are driven from the Party, then we will have arrived in Berlin of Feb. 1933.

Expand full comment
Shelley Riskin's avatar

Thank you, Dennis. We are already in 1930s Germany, but 7-8 million of us showed at the rallies last Saturday that we're resisting and will continue to resist in any way we can!

Expand full comment
Louise Purfield-Coak's avatar

And many more of us at home all add our little actions to the resistance! Vote! Boycott,! Write postcards and letters to other voters, write and comment, inform! They recognize that they are losing, which makes them all the more dangerous! Was it Churchill who said, "We have nothing to fear except fear itself!"

Expand full comment
Shelley Riskin's avatar

FDR is the one who made the statement about fear. But Churchill of course also made so many great statements.

Expand full comment
Robert's avatar

The absolute prerequisite for any sort of ā€œpeaceā€ in the Holy Land is that Hamas has to be utterly crushed. All civilised people should root for Israel. If you support Hamas, psychologically you don’t belong in the West. It IS that simple. Bringing Netanyahu before the ICC makes the latter organisation an even more sicko montypythonish institution than it already is.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jaN31JVNdoI

Expand full comment
Robert's avatar

Total bollox. About ninety-five percent of anti-Semitism comes from ā€œSickostiniansā€ and their supporters, and you guys are about to elect one of them ā€œmayorā€ of the ruins of Nieuw Amsterdam. And who’s calling for the arrest of the Israeli Prime Minister?

Expand full comment
Ted Myers's avatar

Actually, Robert, almost everyone! Most of Netanyahu's motivation these days is trying to forestall being tried and sent to prison for massive corruption.

Expand full comment
Shelley Riskin's avatar

My ONLY reply to Robert: I was going to ignore your comment. But I must say that I feel sorry for you when you call a U.S. community (Jews) 'you guys' and make stereotypical, broad statements that paint all of us as supporting the government of Israel. And I'm very sorry that you've brought your negative comments into a respectful dialogue.

Expand full comment
Robert's avatar

ā€œyou guysā€ refers to commenters here, by no means all of whom are Jewish.

And far too few of you are supporting the government of Israel, under unprecedented attack from real terrorist sickoes.

Expand full comment
Mike Hammer's avatar

Sorry. They foment antisemitism.

Expand full comment
Anon's avatar

Beth - I am actually surprised that there were even 5 of them to oppose. I mean he has all of the ā€œqualificationsā€ that the others had when they were confirmed. He is loyal only to T, he has a small d*ck/small man problem, he spews horrible rhetoric for which he got caught for, and he has a lawsuit against him for sexual harassment (due to canceling a female co-workers hotel room and making her sleep in his room). Isn’t that what they are looking for in this administration now?

With putting my sarcasm aside I am glad that there were at least enough people to deny him his nomination but he also needs to be fired from his White House job.

Expand full comment
Charles's avatar

Beth, please clarify. What didn't you think they had, one backbone or a real pair of gonads? I'd like to think they have both. There's a first time for everything with this Congress.

Expand full comment
Joe H's avatar

The GQP is coming around now because association with Trump is toxic to their political careers.

Expand full comment
bitchybitchybitchy's avatar

Vance's full throated defense of these vile people makes me wonder just what kind of jokes JD has been sharing...

Expand full comment
Susan Gorman Gerke's avatar

Vance is vile. He has no integrity he’ll back anything that makes him one of the deplorables.

Expand full comment
Macman's avatar

But it’s not THE bottom.

Trust me on this.

Expand full comment
Jan C's avatar

Yes, Macman. Trump has never once disappointed me -- every time I think he's bottomed out, he finds a way to go still lower.

Although at the moment It's hard to think of anything lower than his social media post on No Kings Day (but I have faith -- he'll find a way).

Expand full comment
Dain Bramage's avatar

I think tearing down the east wing of the People's House without any sort of permissions or oversight might be a step lower. Either way, he's easily the most despicable "president" (of only red states) to ever hold office.

Expand full comment
pts's avatar

Definitely. Stand by for next week's (or tomorrow's, or this evening's) further lowering of the bar to still greater depths of soulless depravity and inhumanity, exhibited directly by some and indirectly by the blithe dismissal or condoning of same by others.

Expand full comment
Stephen Brady's avatar

He is 30. What experience could he possibly have which would qualify him to be a Special Counsel?

Expand full comment
Betsy Groth's avatar

No one in trump’s cabinet are qualified for their job

Expand full comment
Daniel H Laemmerhirt's avatar

SPECTACULAR ass-kisser, LOVES to be on his back and is woefully under-educated. Those are the only qualifications needed.

Expand full comment
Stephen Brady's avatar

There are no qualifications for the tRump Regime except absolute fealty and the willingness to abase themselves for the Orange Monster.

Expand full comment
Jan S. Gephardt's avatar

If we in red states keep hammering away with the outrage, we might peel off a few more.

Expand full comment
Mad Potter's avatar

And yet they meekly go along with the absolute protection of child rapists……

Expand full comment
ISOequanimity's avatar

JDV ā€œcreates stories.ā€ He admitted it to Dana Bash on CNN 9/16/2024: If I have to create stories so that the American media actually pays attention to the suffering of the American people, then that’s what I’m going to do, Dana.ā€ He wasn’t VP yet. Not sure how he wasn’t disbarred for that. https://www.yahoo.com/news/putting-springfield-spotlight-j-d-093000731.html

Expand full comment
Kathy Hughes's avatar

JD lies and is full of it.

Expand full comment
Robert's avatar

The cat memes were accurate, and not even ā€œfake butā€. Far less untrue than the rubbish the fake news media puts out. And the same thing’s happening with swans in the U.K.

Expand full comment
Henry Jay Forman's avatar

10% of the R Senators oppose revealing that the party has been taken over by Hitler fans. Whoopee!!

Expand full comment
Elizabeth Magin's avatar

Not sure there is any bottom to their depravity.

Expand full comment
Eric Kisch's avatar

Robert, you conclude: "Unlike Vance and the GOP operatives who feel that their loyalty to Trump allows them to promote the sickest and most hateful views imaginable, Senate Republicans have a bottom below which they won’t sink." What is missing is a critical word like "a few" or "some". But alas the majority are still ok with brown noses. They also at a bottom but not the one you are referring to.

Expand full comment
richard winkler's avatar

Wrong. They have no bottom, and they have ruined this country.

Expand full comment
Cecilia Iwao's avatar

I really find this disgusting.

Expand full comment
Mary Ann Dimand's avatar

(Tangentially, I can't conceive why Martin Luther King, Jr. Day should go to the seventh circle, which is the circle of the violent: those people (especially powerful people who are violent against other people, people who experience suicide, and people who are violent against God. What on earth does he mean? Even aside from the day being a holiday and not a person, why the violent?)

Expand full comment
Morris Gray's avatar

Do you think that JDV has even read Dante?

Expand full comment
Louise Purfield-Coak's avatar

JD Vance didn't even know that Greenland is ice covered.

Expand full comment
Dain Bramage's avatar

Just Dance wouldn't know Dante if you bitchslapped him with a Dante book.

Expand full comment
Cecilia Iwao's avatar

No

Expand full comment
Mary Ann Dimand's avatar

It doesn't sound like it.

Expand full comment
Cecilia Iwao's avatar

Exactly

Expand full comment
Judy Sherwood's avatar

Amazing... how wonderful to know that FIVE (5) R's have a bottom.

Expand full comment
Susan from OC's avatar

They oppose him now, but will they be convinced to vote to confirm?

Expand full comment
Dain Bramage's avatar

He withdrew himself from consideration. The nomination didn't make it out of committee, so it won't face a confirmation vote,

thankfully.

Expand full comment